From 266529fa1271a942920845072efb588c64c4aba3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Simon-Kor <52245124+Simon-Kor@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 17:31:18 +0200 Subject: unexpected behavior of vampire The task topological behavior is proofed in seconds by just vampire, but with mode casc it takes plenty seconds --- .../50-plus-secounds-for-iff-stamtent.p | 6 +++++ .../topological-basis-behovoir.p | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+) create mode 100644 vampire-taks-with-unexpacted-behavoir/50-plus-secounds-for-iff-stamtent.p create mode 100644 vampire-taks-with-unexpacted-behavoir/topological-basis-behovoir.p (limited to 'vampire-taks-with-unexpacted-behavoir') diff --git a/vampire-taks-with-unexpacted-behavoir/50-plus-secounds-for-iff-stamtent.p b/vampire-taks-with-unexpacted-behavoir/50-plus-secounds-for-iff-stamtent.p new file mode 100644 index 0000000..19ed046 --- /dev/null +++ b/vampire-taks-with-unexpacted-behavoir/50-plus-secounds-for-iff-stamtent.p @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ +fof(inters_in_genopens,conjecture,unions(fB)=fX). +fof(topological_basis,axiom,![XB,XX]:(topological_basis(XB,XX)<=>(unions(XB)=XX&![XU,XV,Xx]:((elem(XU,XB)&elem(XV,XB)&elem(Xx,XU)&elem(Xx,XV))=>?[XW]:(elem(XW,XB)&elem(Xx,XW)&subseteq(XW,XU)&subseteq(XW,XV)))))). +fof(inters_in_genopens1,axiom,elem(fx,fVprimeprime)&subseteq(fVprimeprime,fC)&elem(fVprimeprime,fB)). +fof(inters_in_genopens2,axiom,elem(fx,fVprime)&subseteq(fVprime,fA)&elem(fVprime,fB)). +fof(inters_in_genopens3,axiom,elem(fx,inter(fA,fC))). +fof(inters_in_genopens4,axiom,topological_basis(fB,fX)). diff --git a/vampire-taks-with-unexpacted-behavoir/topological-basis-behovoir.p b/vampire-taks-with-unexpacted-behavoir/topological-basis-behovoir.p new file mode 100644 index 0000000..76b03e4 --- /dev/null +++ b/vampire-taks-with-unexpacted-behavoir/topological-basis-behovoir.p @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@ +% It doesn't make sense for me that this task takes so long. It taks on my computer nearly 50-60 secounds. + +fof(inters_in_genopens,conjecture,?[XW]:(elem(XW,fB)&elem(fx,XW)&subseteq(XW,fvprime)&subseteq(XW,fVprimeprime))). +%fof(topological_basis,axiom,![XB,XX]:(topological_basis(XB,XX)<=>(unions(XB)=XX&![XU,XV,Xx]:((elem(XU,XB)&elem(XV,XB)&elem(Xx,XU)&elem(Xx,XV))=>?[XW]:(elem(XW,XB)&elem(Xx,XW)&subseteq(XW,XU)&subseteq(XW,XV)))))). +fof(inters_in_genopens1,axiom,elem(fx,fVprimeprime)&subseteq(fVprimeprime,fC)&elem(fVprimeprime,fB)). +fof(inters_in_genopens2,axiom,elem(fx,fVprime)&subseteq(fVprime,fA)&elem(fVprime,fB)). +fof(inters_in_genopens3,axiom,elem(fx,inter(fA,fC))). +fof(inters_in_genopens4,axiom,topological_basis(fB,fX)). + +fof(topological_basis1,axiom,![XU,XV,Xx]:((elem(XU,fB)&elem(XV,fB)&elem(Xx,XU)&elem(Xx,XV))=>?[XW]:(elem(XW,fB)&elem(Xx,XW)&subseteq(XW,XU)&subseteq(XW,XV)))). + +fof(inters_in_genopens10,axiom,subseteq(fVprime,fA)). +fof(inters_in_genopens11,axiom,subseteq(fVprimeprime,fC)). +fof(inters_in_genopens12,axiom,elem(fx,fVprime)). +fof(inters_in_genopens13,axiom,elem(fx,fVprimeprime)). + + +% the task (unions(fB)=fX) takes only 0.2 secounds +% but if it is stated as an axiom it doesn't effect any proof time. + + +% with this axiom it takes 27 secounds so it improve the overall time, +% but this axiom is just a "and" more and combines axiom 1 and 2 +% fof(inters_in_genopens5,axiom,elem(fVprimeprime,fB)&elem(fVprimeprime,fB)&elem(fx,fVprime)&elem(fx,fVprimeprime)). + +% fof(topological_basis1,axiom,![XU,XV,Xx]:((elem(XU,fB)&elem(XV,fB)&elem(Xx,XU)&elem(Xx,XV))=>?[XW]:(elem(XW,fB)&elem(Xx,XW)&subseteq(XW,XU)&subseteq(XW,XV)))). \ No newline at end of file -- cgit v1.2.3