summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authoradelon <22380201+adelon@users.noreply.github.com>2026-02-17 15:05:43 +0100
committeradelon <22380201+adelon@users.noreply.github.com>2026-02-17 15:05:43 +0100
commit512ebfcff8674d15b911d2da5afe683ceff232ab (patch)
treeb178ba79d45c4137d16827a19d9f9791090029ec
parent659ce79fa1764c2a174c398949de5862930d8f44 (diff)
Clean
-rw-r--r--vampire-taks-with-unexpacted-behavoir/50-plus-secounds-for-iff-stamtent.p6
-rw-r--r--vampire-taks-with-unexpacted-behavoir/topological-basis-behovoir.p26
2 files changed, 0 insertions, 32 deletions
diff --git a/vampire-taks-with-unexpacted-behavoir/50-plus-secounds-for-iff-stamtent.p b/vampire-taks-with-unexpacted-behavoir/50-plus-secounds-for-iff-stamtent.p
deleted file mode 100644
index 19ed046..0000000
--- a/vampire-taks-with-unexpacted-behavoir/50-plus-secounds-for-iff-stamtent.p
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,6 +0,0 @@
-fof(inters_in_genopens,conjecture,unions(fB)=fX).
-fof(topological_basis,axiom,![XB,XX]:(topological_basis(XB,XX)<=>(unions(XB)=XX&![XU,XV,Xx]:((elem(XU,XB)&elem(XV,XB)&elem(Xx,XU)&elem(Xx,XV))=>?[XW]:(elem(XW,XB)&elem(Xx,XW)&subseteq(XW,XU)&subseteq(XW,XV)))))).
-fof(inters_in_genopens1,axiom,elem(fx,fVprimeprime)&subseteq(fVprimeprime,fC)&elem(fVprimeprime,fB)).
-fof(inters_in_genopens2,axiom,elem(fx,fVprime)&subseteq(fVprime,fA)&elem(fVprime,fB)).
-fof(inters_in_genopens3,axiom,elem(fx,inter(fA,fC))).
-fof(inters_in_genopens4,axiom,topological_basis(fB,fX)).
diff --git a/vampire-taks-with-unexpacted-behavoir/topological-basis-behovoir.p b/vampire-taks-with-unexpacted-behavoir/topological-basis-behovoir.p
deleted file mode 100644
index 76b03e4..0000000
--- a/vampire-taks-with-unexpacted-behavoir/topological-basis-behovoir.p
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,26 +0,0 @@
-% It doesn't make sense for me that this task takes so long. It taks on my computer nearly 50-60 secounds.
-
-fof(inters_in_genopens,conjecture,?[XW]:(elem(XW,fB)&elem(fx,XW)&subseteq(XW,fvprime)&subseteq(XW,fVprimeprime))).
-%fof(topological_basis,axiom,![XB,XX]:(topological_basis(XB,XX)<=>(unions(XB)=XX&![XU,XV,Xx]:((elem(XU,XB)&elem(XV,XB)&elem(Xx,XU)&elem(Xx,XV))=>?[XW]:(elem(XW,XB)&elem(Xx,XW)&subseteq(XW,XU)&subseteq(XW,XV)))))).
-fof(inters_in_genopens1,axiom,elem(fx,fVprimeprime)&subseteq(fVprimeprime,fC)&elem(fVprimeprime,fB)).
-fof(inters_in_genopens2,axiom,elem(fx,fVprime)&subseteq(fVprime,fA)&elem(fVprime,fB)).
-fof(inters_in_genopens3,axiom,elem(fx,inter(fA,fC))).
-fof(inters_in_genopens4,axiom,topological_basis(fB,fX)).
-
-fof(topological_basis1,axiom,![XU,XV,Xx]:((elem(XU,fB)&elem(XV,fB)&elem(Xx,XU)&elem(Xx,XV))=>?[XW]:(elem(XW,fB)&elem(Xx,XW)&subseteq(XW,XU)&subseteq(XW,XV)))).
-
-fof(inters_in_genopens10,axiom,subseteq(fVprime,fA)).
-fof(inters_in_genopens11,axiom,subseteq(fVprimeprime,fC)).
-fof(inters_in_genopens12,axiom,elem(fx,fVprime)).
-fof(inters_in_genopens13,axiom,elem(fx,fVprimeprime)).
-
-
-% the task (unions(fB)=fX) takes only 0.2 secounds
-% but if it is stated as an axiom it doesn't effect any proof time.
-
-
-% with this axiom it takes 27 secounds so it improve the overall time,
-% but this axiom is just a "and" more and combines axiom 1 and 2
-% fof(inters_in_genopens5,axiom,elem(fVprimeprime,fB)&elem(fVprimeprime,fB)&elem(fx,fVprime)&elem(fx,fVprimeprime)).
-
-% fof(topological_basis1,axiom,![XU,XV,Xx]:((elem(XU,fB)&elem(XV,fB)&elem(Xx,XU)&elem(Xx,XV))=>?[XW]:(elem(XW,fB)&elem(Xx,XW)&subseteq(XW,XU)&subseteq(XW,XV)))). \ No newline at end of file