summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/source/Checking/Exact/Proof.hs
blob: f3f3b9de3d492273bffb7f7c4b3bc7ee9eb30f8d (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
1001
1002
1003
1004
1005
1006
1007
1008
1009
1010
1011
1012
1013
1014
1015
1016
1017
1018
1019
1020
1021
1022
1023
1024
1025
1026
1027
1028
1029
1030
1031
1032
1033
1034
1035
1036
1037
1038
1039
1040
1041
1042
1043
1044
1045
1046
1047
1048
1049
1050
1051
1052
1053
1054
1055
1056
1057
1058
1059
1060
1061
1062
1063
1064
1065
1066
1067
1068
1069
1070
1071
1072
1073
1074
1075
1076
1077
1078
1079
1080
1081
1082
1083
1084
1085
1086
1087
1088
1089
1090
1091
1092
1093
1094
1095
1096
1097
1098
1099
1100
1101
1102
1103
1104
1105
1106
1107
1108
1109
1110
1111
1112
1113
1114
1115
1116
1117
1118
1119
1120
1121
1122
1123
1124
1125
1126
1127
1128
1129
1130
1131
1132
1133
1134
1135
1136
1137
1138
1139
1140
1141
1142
1143
1144
1145
1146
1147
1148
1149
1150
1151
1152
1153
1154
1155
1156
1157
1158
1159
1160
1161
1162
1163
1164
1165
1166
1167
1168
1169
1170
1171
1172
1173
1174
1175
1176
1177
1178
1179
1180
1181
1182
1183
1184
1185
1186
1187
1188
1189
1190
1191
1192
1193
1194
1195
1196
1197
1198
1199
1200
1201
1202
1203
1204
1205
1206
1207
1208
1209
1210
1211
1212
1213
1214
1215
1216
1217
1218
1219
1220
1221
1222
1223
1224
1225
1226
1227
1228
1229
1230
1231
1232
1233
1234
1235
1236
1237
1238
1239
1240
1241
1242
1243
1244
1245
1246
1247
1248
1249
1250
1251
1252
1253
1254
1255
1256
1257
1258
1259
1260
1261
1262
1263
1264
1265
1266
1267
1268
1269
1270
1271
1272
1273
1274
1275
1276
1277
1278
1279
1280
1281
1282
1283
1284
1285
1286
1287
1288
1289
1290
1291
1292
1293
1294
1295
1296
1297
1298
1299
1300
1301
1302
1303
1304
1305
1306
1307
1308
1309
1310
1311
1312
1313
1314
1315
1316
1317
1318
1319
1320
1321
1322
1323
1324
1325
1326
1327
1328
1329
1330
1331
1332
1333
1334
1335
1336
1337
1338
1339
1340
1341
1342
1343
1344
1345
1346
1347
1348
1349
1350
1351
1352
1353
1354
1355
1356
1357
1358
1359
1360
1361
1362
1363
1364
1365
1366
1367
1368
1369
1370
1371
1372
1373
1374
1375
1376
1377
1378
1379
1380
1381
1382
1383
1384
1385
1386
1387
1388
1389
1390
1391
1392
1393
1394
1395
1396
1397
1398
1399
1400
1401
1402
1403
1404
1405
1406
1407
1408
1409
1410
1411
1412
1413
1414
1415
1416
1417
1418
1419
1420
1421
1422
1423
1424
1425
1426
1427
1428
1429
1430
1431
1432
1433
1434
1435
1436
1437
1438
1439
1440
1441
1442
1443
1444
1445
1446
1447
1448
1449
1450
1451
1452
1453
1454
1455
1456
1457
1458
1459
1460
1461
1462
1463
1464
1465
1466
1467
1468
1469
1470
1471
1472
1473
1474
1475
1476
1477
1478
1479
1480
1481
1482
1483
1484
1485
1486
1487
1488
1489
1490
1491
1492
1493
1494
1495
1496
1497
1498
1499
1500
1501
1502
1503
1504
1505
1506
1507
1508
1509
{-# LANGUAGE DerivingStrategies #-}
{-# LANGUAGE NoImplicitPrelude #-}

-- | Exact lowering for the first ordinary theorem/proof fragment.
--
-- This module is the trusted owner of structural local-proof composition.  Its
-- private prepared tree controls when assumptions and proved local claims
-- become available and executes discharges depth-first.  The declaration
-- boundary validates typed tasks and authority; it does not reconstruct this
-- derivation.
module Checking.Exact.Proof
    ( PreparedExactProof
    , preparedExactProofSyntaxId
    , preparedExactProofFirstOmission
    , prepareExactProof
    , CheckedExactProofAuthorization
    , lowerPreparedExactProof
    , authorizeCheckedExactProof
    , PreparedFinalPreludeFoundationClaim
    , prepareFinalPreludeFoundationClaim
    , CheckedFinalPreludeFoundationAuthorization
    , lowerPreparedFinalPreludeFoundationClaim
    , authorizeCheckedFinalPreludeFoundationClaim
    , ExactProofError(..)
    , exactProofErrorLocation
    , renderExactProofError
    ) where

import Base
import Checking.Authority qualified as Authority
import Checking.Backend.Problem qualified as Backend
import Checking.Core
import Checking.Declaration qualified as Declaration
import Checking.Exact qualified as Exact
import Checking.Foundation
import Checking.Identity
import Checking.Kernel.Derivation (foundationFactDerivation)
import Checking.Semantic
import Felix.Cache.Codec
import Report.Location
import Syntax.Abstract qualified as Raw

import Control.Monad.Except (ExceptT)
import Control.Monad.Except qualified as Except
import Control.Monad (foldM, unless, when)
import Control.Monad.State.Strict (StateT)
import Control.Monad.State.Strict qualified as State
import Data.ByteString (ByteString)
import Data.List.NonEmpty qualified as NonEmpty
import Data.Set qualified as Set
import Data.Text qualified as Text
import Data.Vector (Vector)
import Numeric.Natural (Natural)


data ExactProofError
    = ExactProofUnsupportedClaim !Location
    | ExactProofUnsupportedStep !Location
    | ExactProofSetInductionVariableRequired !Location
    | ExactProofSetInductionVariableNotActive
        !Location !Raw.VarSymbol
    | ExactProofSetInductionNotOutermost !Location
    | ExactProofSetInductionGoalMismatch !Location
    | ExactProofSetExtensionalityGoalMismatch !Location
    | ExactProofSetExtensionalityDirectionsUnavailable !Location
    | ExactProofExpectedUniversalGoal !Location
    | ExactProofExpectedImplicationGoal !Location
    | ExactProofGoalStatementMismatch !Location
    | ExactProofContradictionGoalMismatch !Location
    | ExactProofLocalFunctionBinderMismatch !Location
    | ExactProofLocalFunctionNameConflict !Location
    | ExactProofUnknownReference !Location !Raw.Marker
    | ExactProofElaborationFailed !Exact.ExactCompileError
    | ExactProofObligationPreparationFailed
        !Location
        !(Declaration.VampireObligationPreparationError
            Exact.ExactLocalId)
    | ExactProofFoundationLeafRequiresImplicitAuto !Location
    | ExactProofFoundationLeafTargetMismatch !Location
    | ExactProofFoundationLeafTargetAmbiguous !Location
    deriving stock (Show, Eq)

exactProofErrorLocation :: ExactProofError -> Location
exactProofErrorLocation = \case
    ExactProofUnsupportedClaim location -> location
    ExactProofUnsupportedStep location -> location
    ExactProofSetInductionVariableRequired location -> location
    ExactProofSetInductionVariableNotActive location _variable ->
        location
    ExactProofSetInductionNotOutermost location -> location
    ExactProofSetInductionGoalMismatch location -> location
    ExactProofSetExtensionalityGoalMismatch location -> location
    ExactProofSetExtensionalityDirectionsUnavailable location -> location
    ExactProofExpectedUniversalGoal location -> location
    ExactProofExpectedImplicationGoal location -> location
    ExactProofGoalStatementMismatch location -> location
    ExactProofContradictionGoalMismatch location -> location
    ExactProofLocalFunctionBinderMismatch location -> location
    ExactProofLocalFunctionNameConflict location -> location
    ExactProofUnknownReference location _marker -> location
    ExactProofElaborationFailed failure ->
        Exact.exactCompileErrorLocation failure
    ExactProofObligationPreparationFailed location _failure -> location
    ExactProofFoundationLeafRequiresImplicitAuto location -> location
    ExactProofFoundationLeafTargetMismatch location -> location
    ExactProofFoundationLeafTargetAmbiguous location -> location

renderExactProofError :: ExactProofError -> Text
renderExactProofError = \case
    ExactProofUnsupportedClaim location ->
        at location <> "this claim is not yet supported by the typed checker"
    ExactProofUnsupportedStep location ->
        at location <> "this proof step is not yet supported by the typed checker"
    ExactProofSetInductionVariableRequired location ->
        at location <> "exact set induction requires a named set variable"
    ExactProofSetInductionVariableNotActive location variable ->
        at location <> "the set-induction variable " <> shown variable
            <> " is not an active exact binder"
    ExactProofSetInductionNotOutermost location ->
        at location <> "set induction must currently be outermost"
    ExactProofSetInductionGoalMismatch location ->
        at location <> "the set-induction variable does not belong to this goal"
    ExactProofSetExtensionalityGoalMismatch location ->
        at location <> "set extensionality requires a set-equality goal"
    ExactProofSetExtensionalityDirectionsUnavailable location ->
        at location
            <> "set extensionality requires both directions as proved local claims"
    ExactProofExpectedUniversalGoal location ->
        at location <> "this fix step requires a universal goal"
    ExactProofExpectedImplicationGoal location ->
        at location <> "this assume step requires an implication goal"
    ExactProofGoalStatementMismatch location ->
        at location <> "the proof step does not match the current goal"
    ExactProofContradictionGoalMismatch location ->
        at location <> "contradiction requires falsum as the current goal"
    ExactProofLocalFunctionBinderMismatch location ->
        at location <> "the function argument must match its domain binder"
    ExactProofLocalFunctionNameConflict location ->
        at location <> "the function and argument names must be distinct"
    ExactProofUnknownReference location marker ->
        at location <> "the cited fact " <> shown marker <> " is not visible"
    ExactProofElaborationFailed failure ->
        Exact.renderExactCompileError failure
    ExactProofObligationPreparationFailed location failure ->
        at location <> "the exact proof obligation is invalid: " <> shown failure
    ExactProofFoundationLeafRequiresImplicitAuto location ->
        at location
            <> "a confined foundation claim requires an implicit Auto proof"
    ExactProofFoundationLeafTargetMismatch location ->
        at location <> "the claim does not exactly match a foundation axiom"
    ExactProofFoundationLeafTargetAmbiguous location ->
        at location <> "the claim matches more than one foundation axiom"
  where
    at location = locationToText location <> ": "
    shown :: Show value => value -> Text
    shown = Text.pack . show

data ExactLocalOrigin
    = ExactAssumption
    | ExactDerivedClaim
    | ExactLocalDefinition
    deriving stock (Show, Eq, Ord)

data PreparedLocal = PreparedLocal
    !Backend.LocalPremiseOrdinal
    !ExactLocalOrigin
    !(Vector (Exact.ExactLocalId, CoreType))
    !(ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId)

data PreparedJustification
    = PreparedAuto
    | PreparedReferences
        !(NonEmpty SemanticFactOccurrenceFingerprint)
    | PreparedLocalOnly

data PreparedDischarge
    = PreparedVampireDischarge
        !Location
        !PreparedJustification
        !(ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId)
        !(Declaration.PreparedVampireObligation
            Exact.ExactLocalId
            ExactLocalOrigin)
    | PreparedSetExtensionality
        !Location
        !(ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId)

data PreparedProof
    = PreparedImplicitAuto !PreparedDischarge
    | PreparedQed !PreparedDischarge
    | PreparedOmitted
        !Location
        !(ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId)
    | PreparedFix ![Exact.ExactLocalId] !PreparedProof
    | PreparedAssume
        !(ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId)
        !PreparedProof
    | PreparedTake
        ![Exact.ExactLocalId]
        !(ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId)
        !PreparedDischarge
        !PreparedProof
    | PreparedSetInduction
        !(ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId)
        !PreparedDischarge
    | PreparedHave
        !(ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId)
        !PreparedDischarge
        !PreparedProof
    | PreparedSubclaim
        !(ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId)
        !PreparedProof
        !PreparedProof
    | PreparedDefine
        !Exact.ExactLocalId
        !(ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId)
        !(ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId)
        !PreparedProof
    | PreparedDefineFunction
        !Exact.ExactLocalId
        !(ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId)
        !(ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId)
        !PreparedProof
    | PreparedContradiction !PreparedDischarge

data PreparedExactProof = PreparedExactProof
    !Location
    !SemanticName
    !(ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId)
    !PreparedProof
    !ProofSyntaxId

data PreparedFinalPreludeFoundationClaim =
    PreparedFinalPreludeFoundationClaim
    !Location
    !SemanticName
    !(ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId)
    !FoundationAxiomTag
    !ProofSyntaxId

preparedExactProofSyntaxId :: PreparedExactProof -> ProofSyntaxId
preparedExactProofSyntaxId
        (PreparedExactProof _location _alias _target _proof syntax) =
    syntax

preparedExactProofFirstOmission :: PreparedExactProof -> Maybe Location
preparedExactProofFirstOmission
        (PreparedExactProof _location _alias _target proof _syntax) =
    preparedProofFirstOmission proof

data PrepareState = PrepareState
    { prepareNextLocal :: !Natural
    , prepareNextPremise :: !Natural
    }

type Prepare =
    StateT
        PrepareState
        (ExceptT ExactProofError (Declaration.LoweringDriver))

prepareExactProof
    :: Raw.Block
    -> Maybe Raw.Proof
    -> Declaration.LoweringDriver
        (Either ExactProofError PreparedExactProof)
prepareExactProof block explicitProof =
    Except.runExceptT
        (State.evalStateT prepare initialState)
  where
    initialState = PrepareState 0 0

    prepare =
        case block of
            Raw.BlockClaim
                    _kind location _title (Raw.Marker marker)
                    (Raw.Claim assumptions statement) -> do
                envelope <-
                    liftDriver
                        (Exact.prepareExactClaimEnvelope assumptions statement)
                        >>= either
                            (throwProof . ExactProofElaborationFailed)
                            pure
                let targetCore = Exact.preparedExactClaimTarget envelope
                unless (null (scopedCoreContext targetCore))
                    (throwProof
                        (ExactProofUnsupportedClaim location))
                (context, openedGoal, identities) <-
                    openEnvelopeVariables
                        targetCore
                        (Exact.preparedExactClaimVariables envelope)
                        (Exact.preparedExactClaimContext envelope)
                (locals, bodyGoal, antecedents) <-
                    openEnvelopeAntecedents
                        context
                        openedGoal
                        (Exact.preparedExactClaimAntecedentCount envelope)
                bodyProof <-
                    case explicitProof of
                        Nothing ->
                            PreparedImplicitAuto
                                <$> prepareDischargeWith
                                    DirectDischarge
                                    []
                                    Nothing
                                    location
                                    context
                                    locals
                                    bodyGoal
                                    Raw.JustificationEmpty
                        Just sourceProof ->
                            prepareProof
                                location
                                context
                                locals
                                (Just antecedents)
                                bodyGoal
                                sourceProof
                let withAssumptions =
                        foldr PreparedAssume bodyProof antecedents
                    proof =
                        case identities of
                            [] -> withAssumptions
                            _ -> PreparedFix identities withAssumptions
                pure
                    (PreparedExactProof
                        location
                        (semanticName marker)
                        targetCore
                        proof
                        (proofSyntaxId
                            (encodePreparedProof proof)))
            _ ->
                throwProof
                    (ExactProofUnsupportedClaim (locate block))

prepareFinalPreludeFoundationClaim
    :: CheckedFoundation
    -> Raw.Block
    -> Maybe Raw.Proof
    -> Declaration.LoweringDriver
        (Either ExactProofError PreparedFinalPreludeFoundationClaim)
prepareFinalPreludeFoundationClaim foundation block explicitProof =
    Except.runExceptT do
        case (block, explicitProof) of
            ( Raw.BlockClaim
                    _kind location _title (Raw.Marker marker)
                    (Raw.Claim assumptions statement)
              , Nothing
              ) -> do
                envelope <-
                    Except.lift
                        (Exact.prepareExactClaimEnvelope
                            assumptions
                            statement)
                        >>= either
                            (Except.throwError
                                . ExactProofElaborationFailed)
                            pure
                unless
                    ( null (Exact.preparedExactClaimVariables envelope)
                        && Exact.preparedExactClaimAntecedentCount envelope
                            == 0
                    )
                    (Except.throwError
                        (ExactProofFoundationLeafRequiresImplicitAuto
                            location))
                let target = Exact.preparedExactClaimTarget envelope
                    matches =
                        [ tag
                        | tag <- [minBound .. maxBound]
                        , target == foundationTarget tag
                        ]
                tag <- case matches of
                    [] ->
                        Except.throwError
                            (ExactProofFoundationLeafTargetMismatch location)
                    [only] ->
                        pure only
                    _ ->
                        Except.throwError
                            (ExactProofFoundationLeafTargetAmbiguous location)
                pure
                    (PreparedFinalPreludeFoundationClaim
                        location
                        (semanticName marker)
                        target
                        tag
                        (implicitAutoProofSyntaxId target))
            (Raw.BlockClaim _kind location _title _marker _claim, Just{}) ->
                Except.throwError
                    (ExactProofFoundationLeafRequiresImplicitAuto location)
            _ ->
                Except.throwError
                    (ExactProofUnsupportedClaim (locate block))
  where
    foundationTarget tag =
        embedClosedCore []
            (mapFrozenGlobals
                absurd
                (foundationAxiomFrozen foundation tag))

openEnvelopeVariables
    :: ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId
    -> [Raw.VarSymbol]
    -> Exact.ExactBinderContext
    -> Prepare
        ( Exact.ExactBinderContext
        , ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId
        , [Exact.ExactLocalId]
        )
openEnvelopeVariables target variables preparedContext =
    case NonEmpty.nonEmpty variables of
        Nothing ->
            pure (preparedContext, target, [])
        Just nonempty -> do
            (_unannotated, opened, identities) <-
                openFixedVariables
                Exact.emptyExactBinderContext
                target
                nonempty
            let expected =
                    reverse
                        (fst <$> toList
                            (Exact.exactBinderContextSupport preparedContext))
            unless
                (identities == expected)
                (impossible
                    "prepared claim annotations do not match opened binders")
            pure (preparedContext, opened, identities)

openEnvelopeAntecedents
    :: Exact.ExactBinderContext
    -> ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId
    -> Natural
    -> Prepare
        ( [PreparedLocal]
        , ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId
        , [ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId]
        )
openEnvelopeAntecedents context initialGoal initialCount =
    go [] [] initialGoal initialCount
  where
    go locals antecedents goal 0 =
        pure (locals, goal, antecedents)
    go locals antecedents goal remaining = do
        (antecedent, conclusion) <-
            maybe
                (impossible
                    "a prepared claim envelope has too few implications")
                pure
                (openScopedImplication goal)
        local <- allocateLocal ExactAssumption context antecedent
        go
            (locals <> [local])
            (antecedents <> [antecedent])
            conclusion
            (remaining - 1)

prepareProof
    :: Location
    -> Exact.ExactBinderContext
    -> [PreparedLocal]
    -- Only the initial proof carries set-induction antecedents.
    -> Maybe [ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId]
    -> ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId
    -> Raw.Proof
    -> Prepare PreparedProof
prepareProof fallback context locals inductionAntecedents goal = \case
    Raw.Omitted location ->
        pure (PreparedOmitted location goal)
    Raw.Qed maybeLocation justification ->
        PreparedQed
            <$> prepareDischarge
                (fromMaybe fallback maybeLocation)
                context
                locals
                goal
                justification
    Raw.FixSymbolic location variables bound continuation -> do
        (context', goal', identities) <-
            openFixedVariables context goal variables
        case bound of
            Raw.Unbounded ->
                PreparedFix identities
                    <$> prepareProof
                        fallback
                        context'
                        locals
                        Nothing
                        goal'
                        continuation
            _ -> do
                constraint <-
                    prepareSymbolicBoundConstraints
                        context' variables bound
                prepareGuardedFix
                    fallback location context' locals goal'
                    identities constraint continuation
    Raw.FixSuchThat location variables statement continuation -> do
        (context', goal', identities) <-
            openFixedVariables context goal variables
        constraint <-
            Exact.preparedExactPropositionCore
                <$> prepareStatement context' statement
        prepareGuardedFix
            fallback location context' locals goal'
            identities constraint continuation
    Raw.Assume location statement continuation -> do
        supplied <- prepareStatement context statement
        when (isNothing (openScopedImplication goal))
            (throwProof (ExactProofExpectedImplicationGoal location))
        (assumption, conclusion) <-
            maybe
                (throwProof (ExactProofGoalStatementMismatch location))
                pure
                (openScopedAssumption
                    (Exact.preparedExactPropositionCore supplied)
                    goal)
        local <- allocateLocal ExactAssumption context assumption
        PreparedAssume assumption
            <$> prepareProof
                fallback
                context
                (locals <> [local])
                Nothing
                conclusion
                continuation
    Raw.TakeVar location variables bound statement justification continuation -> do
        prepareSymbolicTake
            fallback location context locals goal variables bound statement
            justification continuation
    Raw.TakeNoun location nounPhrase justification continuation ->
        prepareNounTake
            fallback location context locals goal nounPhrase
            justification continuation
    Raw.BySetInduction location variable continuation ->
        case (inductionAntecedents, continuation) of
            (Nothing, _proof) ->
                throwProof
                    (ExactProofSetInductionNotOutermost location)
            (Just antecedents, Raw.Qed maybeLocation justification) -> do
                sourceVariable <-
                    case variable of
                        Just (Raw.TermExpr (Raw.ExprVar candidate)) ->
                            pure candidate
                        _ ->
                            throwProof
                                (ExactProofSetInductionVariableRequired
                                    location)
                selected <-
                    maybe
                        (throwProof
                            (ExactProofSetInductionVariableNotActive
                                location
                                sourceVariable))
                        pure
                        (Exact.exactBinderContextIndex
                            sourceVariable context)
                let property =
                        foldr implyChecked goal antecedents
                hypothesis <-
                    maybe
                        (throwProof
                            (ExactProofSetInductionGoalMismatch
                                location))
                        pure
                        (scopedSetInductionHypothesis selected property)
                local <- allocateLocal ExactAssumption context hypothesis
                PreparedSetInduction hypothesis
                    <$> prepareDischarge
                        (fromMaybe location maybeLocation)
                        context
                        (locals <> [local])
                        goal
                        justification
            (Just _antecedents, _proof) ->
                throwProof (ExactProofUnsupportedStep location)
    Raw.Have location Nothing
            (Raw.SymbolicExists _existential variables bound statement)
            justification continuation ->
        prepareSymbolicTake
            fallback location context locals goal variables bound statement
            justification continuation
    Raw.Have location since statement justification continuation -> do
        when (isJust since)
            (throwProof (ExactProofUnsupportedStep location))
        claim <-
            Exact.preparedExactPropositionCore
                <$> prepareStatement context statement
        discharge <-
            prepareDischarge
                location context locals claim justification
        local <- allocateLocal ExactDerivedClaim context claim
        PreparedHave claim discharge
            <$> prepareProof
                fallback
                context
                (locals <> [local])
                Nothing
                goal
                continuation
    Raw.Subclaim location statement subproof continuation -> do
        claim <-
            Exact.preparedExactPropositionCore
                <$> prepareStatement context statement
        preparedSubproof <-
            prepareProof
                location
                context
                locals
                Nothing
                claim
                subproof
        local <- allocateLocal ExactDerivedClaim context claim
        PreparedSubclaim claim preparedSubproof
            <$> prepareProof
                fallback
                context
                (locals <> [local])
                Nothing
                goal
                continuation
    Raw.Define _location variable expression continuation -> do
        body <-
            Exact.preparedExactSetExpressionCore
                <$> ( liftDriver
                        (Exact.prepareExactSetExpression
                            context expression)
                        >>= either
                            (throwProof . ExactProofElaborationFailed)
                            pure
                    )
        identity <- allocateLocalIdentity
        context' <-
            either
                (throwProof . ExactProofElaborationFailed)
                pure
                (Exact.extendExactBinderContext
                    ((identity, variable) :| [])
                    context)
        separationCharacteristic <-
            liftDriver
                (Declaration.currentFoundationAxiomLowering
                    SeparationCharacteristic)
        definition <-
            maybe
                (impossible
                    "an exact set expression did not form a local definition")
                pure
                (scopedSetDefinition separationCharacteristic body)
        local <-
            allocateLocal ExactLocalDefinition context' definition
        PreparedDefine identity body definition
            <$> prepareProof
                fallback
                context'
                (locals <> [local])
                Nothing
                (weakenCheckedScopedCore TySet goal)
                continuation
    Raw.DefineFunction
            location function argument value bound domain continuation -> do
        unless (argument == bound)
            (throwProof
                (ExactProofLocalFunctionBinderMismatch (locate bound)))
        when (function == argument)
            (throwProof
                (ExactProofLocalFunctionNameConflict (locate function)))
        argumentIdentity <- allocateLocalIdentity
        argumentContext <-
            either
                (throwProof . ExactProofElaborationFailed)
                pure
                (Exact.extendExactBinderContext
                    ((argumentIdentity, argument) :| [])
                    context)
        graph <-
            liftDriver
                (Exact.prepareExactLocalFunctionGraph
                    location context argumentContext domain value)
                >>= either
                    (throwProof . ExactProofElaborationFailed)
                    pure
        functionIdentity <- allocateLocalIdentity
        functionContext <-
            either
                (throwProof . ExactProofElaborationFailed)
                pure
                (Exact.extendExactBinderContext
                    ((functionIdentity, function) :| [])
                    context)
        replacementCharacteristic <-
            liftDriver
                (Declaration.currentFoundationAxiomLowering
                    ReplacementCharacteristic)
        definition <-
            maybe
                (impossible
                    "a checked replacement graph did not form a local definition")
                pure
                (scopedCharacteristicDefinition
                    replacementCharacteristic
                    (Exact.preparedExactLocalFunctionGraphCore graph)
                    ( Exact.preparedExactLocalFunctionGraphDomain graph
                        :| [Exact.preparedExactLocalFunctionGraphMap graph]
                    ))
        local <-
            allocateLocal ExactLocalDefinition functionContext definition
        PreparedDefineFunction
            functionIdentity
            (Exact.preparedExactLocalFunctionGraphCore graph)
            definition
            <$> prepareProof
                fallback
                functionContext
                (locals <> [local])
                Nothing
                (weakenCheckedScopedCore TySet goal)
                continuation
    Raw.Contradiction location justification -> do
        unless
            ( scopedCoreType goal == TyProp
                && scopedCoreTerm goal == CFalsum
            )
            (throwProof
                (ExactProofContradictionGoalMismatch location))
        PreparedContradiction
            <$> prepareDischargeWith
                IndirectContradictionDischarge
                []
                Nothing
                location
                context
                locals
                goal
                justification
    proof ->
        throwProof
            (ExactProofUnsupportedStep
                (proofLocation fallback proof))
  where
    implyChecked antecedent conclusion =
        fromMaybe
            (impossible "an exact claim antecedent changed context")
            (implyScopedCore antecedent conclusion)

prepareGuardedFix
    :: Location
    -> Location
    -> Exact.ExactBinderContext
    -> [PreparedLocal]
    -> ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId
    -> [Exact.ExactLocalId]
    -> ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId
    -> Raw.Proof
    -> Prepare PreparedProof
prepareGuardedFix
        fallback location context locals goal identities constraint continuation = do
    (antecedent, conclusion) <-
        maybe
            (throwProof (ExactProofExpectedImplicationGoal location))
            pure
            (openScopedImplication goal)
    unless (constraint == antecedent)
        (throwProof (ExactProofGoalStatementMismatch location))
    local <- allocateLocal ExactAssumption context constraint
    prepared <-
        prepareProof
            fallback
            context
            (locals <> [local])
            Nothing
            conclusion
            continuation
    pure (PreparedFix identities (PreparedAssume constraint prepared))

prepareSymbolicBoundConstraints
    :: Exact.ExactBinderContext
    -> NonEmpty Raw.VarSymbol
    -> Raw.Bound
    -> Prepare (ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId)
prepareSymbolicBoundConstraints context variables bound =
    Exact.preparedExactPropositionCore
        <$> ( liftDriver
                (Exact.prepareExactSymbolicBoundConstraints
                    context variables bound)
                >>= either
                    (throwProof . ExactProofElaborationFailed)
                    pure
            )

prepareSymbolicTake
    :: Location
    -> Location
    -> Exact.ExactBinderContext
    -> [PreparedLocal]
    -> ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId
    -> NonEmpty Raw.VarSymbol
    -> Raw.Bound
    -> Raw.Stmt
    -> Raw.Justification
    -> Raw.Proof
    -> Prepare PreparedProof
prepareSymbolicTake
        fallback location context locals goal variables bound statement
        justification continuation = do
    identities <- traverse (const allocateLocalIdentity) variables
    context' <-
        either
            (throwProof . ExactProofElaborationFailed)
            pure
            (Exact.extendExactBinderContext
                (NonEmpty.zip identities variables)
                context)
    witness <-
        Exact.preparedExactPropositionCore
            <$> ( liftDriver
                    (Exact.prepareExactSymbolicWitnessConstraints
                        context' variables bound statement)
                    >>= either
                        (throwProof . ExactProofElaborationFailed)
                        pure
                )
    prepareTake
        fallback location context locals goal context'
        (toList identities) witness justification continuation

prepareNounTake
    :: Location
    -> Location
    -> Exact.ExactBinderContext
    -> [PreparedLocal]
    -> ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId
    -> Raw.NounPhrase []
    -> Raw.Justification
    -> Raw.Proof
    -> Prepare PreparedProof
prepareNounTake
        fallback location context locals goal nounPhrase
        justification continuation = do
    (identities, context') <-
        case nounPhrase of
            Raw.NounPhrase _left _noun variables _right _suchThat ->
                case NonEmpty.nonEmpty variables of
                    Just binders -> do
                        identities <-
                            traverse (const allocateLocalIdentity) binders
                        context' <-
                            either
                                (throwProof . ExactProofElaborationFailed)
                                pure
                                (Exact.extendExactBinderContext
                                    (NonEmpty.zip identities binders)
                                    context)
                        pure (toList identities, context')
                    Nothing -> do
                        identity <- allocateLocalIdentity
                        context' <-
                            either
                                (throwProof . ExactProofElaborationFailed)
                                pure
                                (Exact.extendExactAnonymousBinderContext
                                    identity context)
                        pure ([identity], context')
    witness <-
        Exact.preparedExactPropositionCore
            <$> ( liftDriver
                    (Exact.prepareExactNounWitnessConstraints
                        context' nounPhrase)
                    >>= either
                        (throwProof . ExactProofElaborationFailed)
                        pure
                )
    prepareTake
        fallback location context locals goal context'
        identities witness justification continuation

prepareTake
    :: Location
    -> Location
    -> Exact.ExactBinderContext
    -> [PreparedLocal]
    -> ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId
    -> Exact.ExactBinderContext
    -> [Exact.ExactLocalId]
    -> ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId
    -> Raw.Justification
    -> Raw.Proof
    -> Prepare PreparedProof
prepareTake
        fallback location context locals goal witnessContext
        identities witness justification continuation = do
    let witnessCount = length identities
        existence = closeTakenWitnesses witnessCount witness
        goal' = weakenForTakenWitnesses witnessCount goal
    discharge <-
        prepareDischarge
            location context locals existence justification
    local <- allocateLocal ExactAssumption witnessContext witness
    PreparedTake identities witness discharge
        <$> prepareProof
            fallback
            witnessContext
            (locals <> [local])
            Nothing
            goal'
            continuation

-- The discharged existential and the opened witness premise are the same
-- checked proposition viewed on opposite sides of existential elimination.
closeTakenWitnesses
    :: Int
    -> ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId
    -> ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId
closeTakenWitnesses binderCount = go binderCount
  where
    go 0 proposition = proposition
    go remaining proposition =
        go (remaining - 1)
            (fromMaybe
                (impossible "a taken witness has no checked binder")
                (closeScopedExists proposition))

weakenForTakenWitnesses
    :: Int
    -> ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId
    -> ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId
weakenForTakenWitnesses binderCount = go binderCount
  where
    go 0 proposition = proposition
    go remaining proposition =
        go (remaining - 1)
            (weakenCheckedScopedCore TySet proposition)

openFixedVariables
    :: Exact.ExactBinderContext
    -> ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId
    -> NonEmpty Raw.VarSymbol
    -> Prepare
        ( Exact.ExactBinderContext
        , ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId
        , [Exact.ExactLocalId]
        )
openFixedVariables initialContext initialGoal variables =
    foldM openOne
        (initialContext, initialGoal, [])
        (toList variables)
  where
    openOne (context, goal, identities) variable = do
        (binderType, body) <-
            maybe
                (throwProof
                    (ExactProofExpectedUniversalGoal
                        (locate variable)))
                pure
                (openScopedForall goal)
        unless (binderType == TySet)
            (throwProof
                (ExactProofExpectedUniversalGoal
                    (locate variable)))
        identity <- allocateLocalIdentity
        context' <-
            either
                (throwProof . ExactProofElaborationFailed)
                pure
                (Exact.extendExactBinderContext
                    ((identity, variable) :| [])
                    context)
        pure (context', body, identities <> [identity])

allocateLocalIdentity :: Prepare Exact.ExactLocalId
allocateLocalIdentity = do
    state <- State.get
    State.put
        state
            { prepareNextLocal = prepareNextLocal state + 1
            }
    pure (Exact.exactLocalId (prepareNextLocal state))

allocateLocal
    :: ExactLocalOrigin
    -> Exact.ExactBinderContext
    -> ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId
    -> Prepare PreparedLocal
allocateLocal origin context proposition = do
    state <- State.get
    State.put
        state
            { prepareNextPremise = prepareNextPremise state + 1
            }
    pure
        (PreparedLocal
            (Backend.localPremiseOrdinal
                (prepareNextPremise state))
            origin
            (Exact.exactBinderContextSupport context)
            proposition)

prepareDischarge
    :: Location
    -> Exact.ExactBinderContext
    -> [PreparedLocal]
    -> ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId
    -> Raw.Justification
    -> Prepare PreparedDischarge
prepareDischarge location context locals goal justification =
    prepareDischargeWith
        DirectDischarge
        [] Nothing location context locals goal justification

data DischargeMode
    = DirectDischarge
    | IndirectContradictionDischarge

prepareDischargeWith
    :: DischargeMode
    -> [FoundationAxiomTag]
    -> Maybe Declaration.VampirePremiseSelection
    -> Location
    -> Exact.ExactBinderContext
    -> [PreparedLocal]
    -> ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId
    -> Raw.Justification
    -> Prepare PreparedDischarge
prepareDischargeWith
        dischargeMode auxiliaries selectionOverride
        location context locals goal justification =
    case justification of
        Raw.JustificationSetExt -> do
            (leftToRight, rightToLeft) <-
                maybe
                    (throwProof
                        (ExactProofSetExtensionalityGoalMismatch location))
                    pure
                    (splitScopedSetEquality goal)
            unless
                ( hasDerivedLocal leftToRight
                    && hasDerivedLocal rightToLeft
                )
                (throwProof
                    (ExactProofSetExtensionalityDirectionsUnavailable
                        location))
            pure (PreparedSetExtensionality location goal)
        _ -> do
            preparedJustification <-
                prepareJustification location justification
            prepared <-
                liftDriver
                    (prepareObligation
                        (Exact.exactBinderContextSupport context)
                        goal
                        (toScopedPremise <$> locals)
                        auxiliaries
                        (fromMaybe
                            (vampirePremiseSelection preparedJustification)
                            selectionOverride))
                    >>= either
                        (throwProof
                            . ExactProofObligationPreparationFailed location)
                        pure
            pure
                (PreparedVampireDischarge
                    location
                    preparedJustification
                    goal
                    prepared)
  where
    prepareObligation =
        case dischargeMode of
            DirectDischarge ->
                Declaration.prepareScopedVampireObligationLowering
            IndirectContradictionDischarge ->
                Declaration.prepareScopedContradictionObligationLowering

    hasDerivedLocal proposition =
        any
            (\case
                PreparedLocal
                        _ordinal ExactDerivedClaim _support local ->
                    local == proposition
                PreparedLocal{} ->
                    False)
            locals

    toScopedPremise
            (PreparedLocal ordinal origin support proposition) =
        Declaration.scopedVampirePremise
            ordinal origin support proposition

prepareJustification
    :: Location
    -> Raw.Justification
    -> Prepare PreparedJustification
prepareJustification _location Raw.JustificationEmpty =
    pure PreparedAuto
prepareJustification location (Raw.JustificationRef markers) = do
    resolved <- traverse (resolveReference location) (toList markers)
    let unique = stableUnique resolved
    case unique of
        [] ->
            impossible "a nonempty citation list resolved to no facts"
        first : rest ->
            pure (PreparedReferences (first :| rest))
prepareJustification _location Raw.JustificationLocal =
    pure PreparedLocalOnly
prepareJustification location Raw.JustificationSetExt =
    throwProof (ExactProofUnsupportedStep location)

vampirePremiseSelection
    :: PreparedJustification
    -> Declaration.VampirePremiseSelection
vampirePremiseSelection = \case
    PreparedAuto ->
        Declaration.VampireImplicitPremises
    PreparedReferences fingerprints ->
        Declaration.VampireExplicitPremises fingerprints
    PreparedLocalOnly ->
        Declaration.VampireLocalPremises

resolveReference
    :: Location
    -> Raw.Marker
    -> Prepare SemanticFactOccurrenceFingerprint
resolveReference location marker@(Raw.Marker name) = do
    resolved <-
        liftDriver
            (Declaration.resolveVisibleFactAliasLowering
                (semanticName name))
    maybe
        (throwProof
            (ExactProofUnknownReference location marker))
        pure
        resolved

prepareStatement
    :: Exact.ExactBinderContext
    -> Raw.Stmt
    -> Prepare Exact.PreparedExactProposition
prepareStatement context statement =
    liftDriver
        (Exact.prepareExactProposition context statement)
        >>= either
            (throwProof . ExactProofElaborationFailed)
            pure

data CheckedExactProofAuthorization = CheckedExactProofAuthorization
    !PreparedProof
    !Bool

lowerPreparedExactProof
    :: PreparedExactProof
    -> Declaration.LoweringDriver
        (Either
            Declaration.DeclarationError
            (Declaration.CheckedDeclaration CheckedExactProofAuthorization))
lowerPreparedExactProof
        (PreparedExactProof _location alias target proof syntax) =
    fmap checked
        <$> Declaration.prepareCandidateSpecLowering
            [] target SearchEligible [alias]
  where
    checked spec =
        Declaration.checkedProofDeclaration
            syntax [] [] [] []
            [Declaration.checkedCandidate spec planning :| []]
            (CheckedExactProofAuthorization
                proof
                (isJust (preparedProofFirstOmission proof)))
      where
        requests = plannedProofRequests proof
        planning
            | isJust (preparedProofFirstOmission proof) =
                Declaration.checkedOmittedPlanning requests []
            | otherwise =
                Declaration.checkedSourceProofPlanning requests []

authorizeCheckedExactProof
    :: CheckedExactProofAuthorization
    -> [NonEmpty Declaration.ReservedCandidate]
    -> Declaration.Declaration ()
authorizeCheckedExactProof
        (CheckedExactProofAuthorization proof hasOmission) = \case
    [candidate :| []]
        | hasOmission ->
            Declaration.authorizeOmittedCandidate
                candidate
                (executePreparedProof proof)
        | otherwise ->
            Declaration.authorizeVampireCandidate
                candidate
                (executePreparedProof proof)
    stages ->
        Declaration.failDeclaration
            (Declaration.CheckedAuthorizationCandidateShapeMismatch
                1 (length stages))

data CheckedFinalPreludeFoundationAuthorization =
    CheckedFinalPreludeFoundationAuthorization !FoundationAxiomTag

lowerPreparedFinalPreludeFoundationClaim
    :: PreparedFinalPreludeFoundationClaim
    -> Declaration.LoweringDriver
        (Either
            Declaration.DeclarationError
            (Declaration.CheckedDeclaration
                CheckedFinalPreludeFoundationAuthorization))
lowerPreparedFinalPreludeFoundationClaim
        (PreparedFinalPreludeFoundationClaim
            _location alias target tag syntax) =
    fmap checked
        <$> Declaration.prepareCandidateSpecLowering
            [] target SearchEligible [alias]
  where
    checked spec =
        Declaration.checkedProofDeclaration
            syntax [] [] [] []
            [ Declaration.checkedCandidate spec
                (Declaration.checkedKernelPlanning
                    (Authority.FoundationLeaf tag) [])
                :| []
            ]
            (CheckedFinalPreludeFoundationAuthorization tag)

authorizeCheckedFinalPreludeFoundationClaim
    :: CheckedFinalPreludeFoundationAuthorization
    -> [NonEmpty Declaration.ReservedCandidate]
    -> Declaration.Declaration ()
authorizeCheckedFinalPreludeFoundationClaim
        (CheckedFinalPreludeFoundationAuthorization tag) = \case
    [candidate :| []] ->
        Declaration.authorizeKernelConstructionCandidate
            (Authority.FoundationLeaf tag)
            candidate
            (pure (foundationFactDerivation tag))
    stages ->
        Declaration.failDeclaration
            (Declaration.CheckedAuthorizationCandidateShapeMismatch
                1 (length stages))

preparedProofFirstOmission :: PreparedProof -> Maybe Location
preparedProofFirstOmission = \case
    PreparedImplicitAuto{} -> Nothing
    PreparedQed{} -> Nothing
    PreparedOmitted location _goal -> Just location
    PreparedFix _identities continuation ->
        preparedProofFirstOmission continuation
    PreparedAssume _antecedent continuation ->
        preparedProofFirstOmission continuation
    PreparedTake _identities _witness _discharge continuation ->
        preparedProofFirstOmission continuation
    PreparedSetInduction _hypothesis _discharge -> Nothing
    PreparedHave _claim _discharge continuation ->
        preparedProofFirstOmission continuation
    PreparedSubclaim _claim subproof continuation ->
        preparedProofFirstOmission subproof
            <|> preparedProofFirstOmission continuation
    PreparedDefine _identity _body _definition continuation ->
        preparedProofFirstOmission continuation
    PreparedDefineFunction _identity _graph _definition continuation ->
        preparedProofFirstOmission continuation
    PreparedContradiction{} -> Nothing

plannedProofRequests
    :: PreparedProof
    -> [Declaration.CheckedPlannedVampireRequest]
plannedProofRequests = \case
    PreparedImplicitAuto discharge -> plannedDischargeRequests discharge
    PreparedQed discharge -> plannedDischargeRequests discharge
    PreparedOmitted{} -> []
    PreparedFix _identities continuation ->
        plannedProofRequests continuation
    PreparedAssume _antecedent continuation ->
        plannedProofRequests continuation
    PreparedTake _identities _witness discharge continuation ->
        plannedDischargeRequests discharge <> plannedProofRequests continuation
    PreparedSetInduction _hypothesis discharge ->
        plannedDischargeRequests discharge
    PreparedHave _claim discharge continuation ->
        plannedDischargeRequests discharge <> plannedProofRequests continuation
    PreparedSubclaim _claim subproof continuation ->
        plannedProofRequests subproof <> plannedProofRequests continuation
    PreparedDefine _identity _body _definition continuation ->
        plannedProofRequests continuation
    PreparedDefineFunction _identity _graph _definition continuation ->
        plannedProofRequests continuation
    PreparedContradiction discharge ->
        plannedDischargeRequests discharge

plannedDischargeRequests
    :: PreparedDischarge
    -> [Declaration.CheckedPlannedVampireRequest]
plannedDischargeRequests = \case
    PreparedVampireDischarge location _justification _goal obligation ->
        [Declaration.checkedPlannedVampireRequest location obligation]
    PreparedSetExtensionality{} -> []

executePreparedProof
    :: PreparedProof
    -> Declaration.CandidateProof ()
executePreparedProof = \case
    PreparedImplicitAuto discharge ->
        executeDischarge discharge
    PreparedQed discharge ->
        executeDischarge discharge
    PreparedOmitted _location _goal ->
        Declaration.recordOmittedUse
    PreparedFix _identities continuation ->
        executePreparedProof continuation
    PreparedAssume _antecedent continuation ->
        executePreparedProof continuation
    PreparedTake _identities _witness discharge continuation -> do
        executeDischarge discharge
        executePreparedProof continuation
    PreparedSetInduction _hypothesis discharge ->
        executeDischarge discharge
    PreparedHave _claim discharge continuation -> do
        executeDischarge discharge
        executePreparedProof continuation
    PreparedSubclaim _claim subproof continuation -> do
        executePreparedProof subproof
        executePreparedProof continuation
    PreparedDefine _identity _body _definition continuation ->
        executePreparedProof continuation
    PreparedDefineFunction _identity _graph _definition continuation ->
        executePreparedProof continuation
    PreparedContradiction discharge ->
        executeDischarge discharge

executeDischarge
    :: PreparedDischarge
    -> Declaration.CandidateProof ()
executeDischarge
        (PreparedVampireDischarge
            location _justification _goal obligation) =
    Declaration.locateProofObligation location
        (Declaration.acceptPreparedVampireObligation obligation)
executeDischarge PreparedSetExtensionality{} =
    pure ()

encodePreparedProof :: PreparedProof -> ByteString
encodePreparedProof =
    encodeCache . putPreparedProof

putPreparedProof :: PreparedProof -> CachePut
putPreparedProof = \case
    PreparedImplicitAuto discharge -> do
        putCacheTag 0x00
        putPreparedDischarge discharge
    PreparedQed discharge -> do
        putCacheTag 0x01
        putPreparedDischarge discharge
    PreparedOmitted _location goal -> do
        putCacheTag 0x06
        putScopedProposition goal
    PreparedFix identities continuation -> do
        putCacheTag 0x02
        putCacheList
            (putCacheNatural . Exact.exactLocalIdValue)
            identities
        putPreparedProof continuation
    PreparedAssume antecedent continuation -> do
        putCacheTag 0x03
        putScopedProposition antecedent
        putPreparedProof continuation
    PreparedTake identities witness discharge continuation -> do
        putCacheTag 0x08
        putCacheList
            (putCacheNatural . Exact.exactLocalIdValue)
            identities
        putScopedProposition witness
        putPreparedDischarge discharge
        putPreparedProof continuation
    PreparedSetInduction hypothesis discharge -> do
        putCacheTag 0x07
        putScopedProposition hypothesis
        putPreparedDischarge discharge
    PreparedHave claim discharge continuation -> do
        putCacheTag 0x04
        putScopedProposition claim
        putPreparedDischarge discharge
        putPreparedProof continuation
    PreparedSubclaim claim subproof continuation -> do
        putCacheTag 0x05
        putScopedProposition claim
        putPreparedProof subproof
        putPreparedProof continuation
    PreparedDefine identity body definition continuation -> do
        putCacheTag 0x09
        putCacheNatural (Exact.exactLocalIdValue identity)
        putScopedTerm body
        putScopedProposition definition
        putPreparedProof continuation
    PreparedContradiction discharge -> do
        putCacheTag 0x0a
        putPreparedDischarge discharge
    PreparedDefineFunction identity graph definition continuation -> do
        putCacheTag 0x0b
        putCacheNatural (Exact.exactLocalIdValue identity)
        putScopedTerm graph
        putScopedProposition definition
        putPreparedProof continuation

putPreparedDischarge :: PreparedDischarge -> CachePut
putPreparedDischarge
        (PreparedVampireDischarge
            _location justification goal _obligation) = do
    putPreparedDischargeSyntax justification goal
putPreparedDischarge
        (PreparedSetExtensionality _location goal) = do
    putCacheTag 0x03
    putScopedProposition goal

putPreparedDischargeSyntax
    :: PreparedJustification
    -> ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId
    -> CachePut
putPreparedDischargeSyntax justification goal = do
    putPreparedJustification justification
    putScopedProposition goal

implicitAutoProofSyntaxId
    :: ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId
    -> ProofSyntaxId
implicitAutoProofSyntaxId goal =
    proofSyntaxId
        (encodeCache do
            putCacheTag 0x00
            putPreparedDischargeSyntax PreparedAuto goal)

putPreparedJustification :: PreparedJustification -> CachePut
putPreparedJustification = \case
    PreparedAuto ->
        putCacheTag 0x00
    PreparedReferences fingerprints -> do
        putCacheTag 0x01
        putCacheList
            putSemanticFactOccurrenceFingerprintCache
            (toList fingerprints)
    PreparedLocalOnly ->
        putCacheTag 0x02

putScopedProposition
    :: ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId
    -> CachePut
putScopedProposition proposition = do
    putCacheList putCoreTypeCache
        (scopedCoreContext proposition)
    putCanonicalTermCache putObjectIdCache
        (scopedCoreTerm proposition)

putScopedTerm
    :: ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId
    -> CachePut
putScopedTerm term = do
    putCacheList putCoreTypeCache
        (scopedCoreContext term)
    putCoreTypeCache (scopedCoreType term)
    putCanonicalTermCache putObjectIdCache
        (scopedCoreTerm term)

proofLocation :: Location -> Raw.Proof -> Location
proofLocation fallback = \case
    Raw.Omitted location -> location
    Raw.Qed maybeLocation _justification ->
        fromMaybe fallback maybeLocation
    Raw.Contradiction location _justification -> location
    Raw.ByCase location _cases -> location
    Raw.ByContradiction location _proof -> location
    Raw.BySetInduction location _term _proof -> location
    Raw.ByOrdInduction location _proof -> location
    Raw.Assume location _statement _proof -> location
    Raw.FixSymbolic location _variables _bound _proof -> location
    Raw.FixSuchThat location _variables _statement _proof -> location
    Raw.Calc location _quantifier _calculation _proof -> location
    Raw.TakeVar location _variables _bound _statement _justification _proof ->
        location
    Raw.TakeNoun location _noun _justification _proof -> location
    Raw.Have location _since _statement _justification _proof -> location
    Raw.Suffices location _statement _justification _proof -> location
    Raw.Subclaim location _statement _subproof _proof -> location
    Raw.Define location _variable _expression _proof -> location
    Raw.DefineFunction location _function _argument _value _bound _domain _proof ->
        location
    Raw.DefineFunctionLocal
            location _function _argument _value _bound _target _rules _proof ->
        location

throwProof :: ExactProofError -> Prepare value
throwProof =
    State.lift . Except.throwError

liftDriver
    :: Declaration.LoweringDriver value
    -> Prepare value
liftDriver =
    State.lift . Except.lift

stableUnique :: Ord value => [value] -> [value]
stableUnique =
    reverse . snd
        . foldl'
            (\(seen, reversed) value ->
                if value `Set.member` seen
                    then (seen, reversed)
                    else
                        ( Set.insert value seen
                        , value : reversed
                        ))
            (Set.empty, [])