1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
1001
1002
1003
1004
1005
1006
1007
1008
1009
1010
1011
1012
1013
1014
1015
1016
1017
1018
1019
1020
1021
1022
1023
1024
1025
1026
1027
1028
1029
1030
1031
1032
1033
1034
1035
1036
1037
1038
1039
1040
1041
1042
1043
1044
1045
1046
1047
1048
1049
1050
1051
1052
1053
1054
1055
1056
1057
1058
1059
1060
1061
1062
1063
1064
1065
1066
1067
1068
1069
1070
1071
1072
1073
1074
1075
1076
1077
1078
1079
1080
1081
1082
1083
1084
1085
1086
1087
1088
1089
1090
1091
1092
1093
1094
1095
1096
1097
1098
1099
1100
1101
1102
1103
1104
1105
1106
1107
1108
1109
1110
1111
1112
1113
1114
1115
1116
1117
1118
1119
1120
1121
1122
1123
1124
1125
1126
1127
1128
1129
1130
1131
1132
1133
1134
1135
1136
1137
1138
1139
1140
1141
1142
1143
1144
1145
1146
1147
1148
1149
1150
1151
1152
1153
1154
1155
1156
1157
1158
1159
1160
1161
1162
1163
1164
1165
1166
1167
1168
1169
1170
1171
1172
1173
1174
1175
1176
1177
1178
1179
1180
1181
1182
1183
1184
1185
1186
1187
1188
1189
1190
1191
1192
1193
1194
1195
1196
1197
1198
1199
1200
1201
1202
1203
1204
1205
1206
1207
1208
1209
1210
1211
1212
1213
1214
1215
1216
1217
1218
1219
1220
1221
1222
1223
1224
1225
1226
1227
1228
1229
1230
1231
1232
1233
1234
1235
1236
1237
1238
1239
1240
1241
1242
1243
1244
1245
1246
1247
1248
1249
1250
1251
1252
1253
1254
1255
1256
1257
1258
1259
1260
1261
1262
1263
1264
1265
1266
1267
1268
1269
1270
1271
1272
1273
1274
1275
1276
1277
1278
1279
1280
1281
1282
1283
1284
1285
1286
1287
1288
1289
1290
1291
1292
1293
1294
1295
1296
1297
1298
1299
1300
1301
1302
1303
1304
1305
1306
1307
1308
1309
1310
1311
1312
1313
1314
1315
1316
1317
1318
1319
1320
1321
1322
1323
1324
1325
1326
1327
1328
1329
1330
1331
1332
1333
1334
1335
1336
1337
1338
1339
1340
1341
1342
1343
1344
1345
1346
1347
1348
1349
1350
1351
1352
1353
1354
1355
1356
1357
1358
1359
1360
1361
1362
1363
1364
1365
1366
1367
1368
1369
1370
1371
1372
1373
1374
1375
1376
1377
1378
1379
1380
1381
1382
1383
1384
1385
1386
1387
1388
1389
1390
1391
1392
1393
1394
1395
1396
1397
1398
1399
1400
1401
1402
1403
1404
1405
1406
1407
1408
1409
1410
1411
1412
1413
1414
1415
1416
1417
1418
1419
1420
1421
1422
1423
1424
1425
1426
1427
1428
1429
1430
1431
1432
1433
1434
1435
1436
1437
1438
1439
1440
1441
1442
1443
1444
1445
1446
1447
1448
1449
1450
1451
1452
1453
1454
1455
1456
1457
1458
1459
1460
1461
1462
1463
1464
1465
1466
1467
1468
1469
1470
1471
1472
1473
1474
1475
1476
1477
1478
1479
1480
1481
1482
1483
1484
1485
1486
1487
1488
1489
1490
1491
1492
1493
1494
1495
1496
1497
1498
1499
1500
1501
1502
1503
1504
1505
1506
1507
1508
1509
|
{-# LANGUAGE DerivingStrategies #-}
{-# LANGUAGE NoImplicitPrelude #-}
-- | Exact lowering for the first ordinary theorem/proof fragment.
--
-- This module is the trusted owner of structural local-proof composition. Its
-- private prepared tree controls when assumptions and proved local claims
-- become available and executes discharges depth-first. The declaration
-- boundary validates typed tasks and authority; it does not reconstruct this
-- derivation.
module Checking.Exact.Proof
( PreparedExactProof
, preparedExactProofSyntaxId
, preparedExactProofFirstOmission
, prepareExactProof
, CheckedExactProofAuthorization
, lowerPreparedExactProof
, authorizeCheckedExactProof
, PreparedFinalPreludeFoundationClaim
, prepareFinalPreludeFoundationClaim
, CheckedFinalPreludeFoundationAuthorization
, lowerPreparedFinalPreludeFoundationClaim
, authorizeCheckedFinalPreludeFoundationClaim
, ExactProofError(..)
, exactProofErrorLocation
, renderExactProofError
) where
import Base
import Checking.Authority qualified as Authority
import Checking.Backend.Problem qualified as Backend
import Checking.Core
import Checking.Declaration qualified as Declaration
import Checking.Exact qualified as Exact
import Checking.Foundation
import Checking.Identity
import Checking.Kernel.Derivation (foundationFactDerivation)
import Checking.Semantic
import Felix.Cache.Codec
import Report.Location
import Syntax.Abstract qualified as Raw
import Control.Monad.Except (ExceptT)
import Control.Monad.Except qualified as Except
import Control.Monad (foldM, unless, when)
import Control.Monad.State.Strict (StateT)
import Control.Monad.State.Strict qualified as State
import Data.ByteString (ByteString)
import Data.List.NonEmpty qualified as NonEmpty
import Data.Set qualified as Set
import Data.Text qualified as Text
import Data.Vector (Vector)
import Numeric.Natural (Natural)
data ExactProofError
= ExactProofUnsupportedClaim !Location
| ExactProofUnsupportedStep !Location
| ExactProofSetInductionVariableRequired !Location
| ExactProofSetInductionVariableNotActive
!Location !Raw.VarSymbol
| ExactProofSetInductionNotOutermost !Location
| ExactProofSetInductionGoalMismatch !Location
| ExactProofSetExtensionalityGoalMismatch !Location
| ExactProofSetExtensionalityDirectionsUnavailable !Location
| ExactProofExpectedUniversalGoal !Location
| ExactProofExpectedImplicationGoal !Location
| ExactProofGoalStatementMismatch !Location
| ExactProofContradictionGoalMismatch !Location
| ExactProofLocalFunctionBinderMismatch !Location
| ExactProofLocalFunctionNameConflict !Location
| ExactProofUnknownReference !Location !Raw.Marker
| ExactProofElaborationFailed !Exact.ExactCompileError
| ExactProofObligationPreparationFailed
!Location
!(Declaration.VampireObligationPreparationError
Exact.ExactLocalId)
| ExactProofFoundationLeafRequiresImplicitAuto !Location
| ExactProofFoundationLeafTargetMismatch !Location
| ExactProofFoundationLeafTargetAmbiguous !Location
deriving stock (Show, Eq)
exactProofErrorLocation :: ExactProofError -> Location
exactProofErrorLocation = \case
ExactProofUnsupportedClaim location -> location
ExactProofUnsupportedStep location -> location
ExactProofSetInductionVariableRequired location -> location
ExactProofSetInductionVariableNotActive location _variable ->
location
ExactProofSetInductionNotOutermost location -> location
ExactProofSetInductionGoalMismatch location -> location
ExactProofSetExtensionalityGoalMismatch location -> location
ExactProofSetExtensionalityDirectionsUnavailable location -> location
ExactProofExpectedUniversalGoal location -> location
ExactProofExpectedImplicationGoal location -> location
ExactProofGoalStatementMismatch location -> location
ExactProofContradictionGoalMismatch location -> location
ExactProofLocalFunctionBinderMismatch location -> location
ExactProofLocalFunctionNameConflict location -> location
ExactProofUnknownReference location _marker -> location
ExactProofElaborationFailed failure ->
Exact.exactCompileErrorLocation failure
ExactProofObligationPreparationFailed location _failure -> location
ExactProofFoundationLeafRequiresImplicitAuto location -> location
ExactProofFoundationLeafTargetMismatch location -> location
ExactProofFoundationLeafTargetAmbiguous location -> location
renderExactProofError :: ExactProofError -> Text
renderExactProofError = \case
ExactProofUnsupportedClaim location ->
at location <> "this claim is not yet supported by the typed checker"
ExactProofUnsupportedStep location ->
at location <> "this proof step is not yet supported by the typed checker"
ExactProofSetInductionVariableRequired location ->
at location <> "exact set induction requires a named set variable"
ExactProofSetInductionVariableNotActive location variable ->
at location <> "the set-induction variable " <> shown variable
<> " is not an active exact binder"
ExactProofSetInductionNotOutermost location ->
at location <> "set induction must currently be outermost"
ExactProofSetInductionGoalMismatch location ->
at location <> "the set-induction variable does not belong to this goal"
ExactProofSetExtensionalityGoalMismatch location ->
at location <> "set extensionality requires a set-equality goal"
ExactProofSetExtensionalityDirectionsUnavailable location ->
at location
<> "set extensionality requires both directions as proved local claims"
ExactProofExpectedUniversalGoal location ->
at location <> "this fix step requires a universal goal"
ExactProofExpectedImplicationGoal location ->
at location <> "this assume step requires an implication goal"
ExactProofGoalStatementMismatch location ->
at location <> "the proof step does not match the current goal"
ExactProofContradictionGoalMismatch location ->
at location <> "contradiction requires falsum as the current goal"
ExactProofLocalFunctionBinderMismatch location ->
at location <> "the function argument must match its domain binder"
ExactProofLocalFunctionNameConflict location ->
at location <> "the function and argument names must be distinct"
ExactProofUnknownReference location marker ->
at location <> "the cited fact " <> shown marker <> " is not visible"
ExactProofElaborationFailed failure ->
Exact.renderExactCompileError failure
ExactProofObligationPreparationFailed location failure ->
at location <> "the exact proof obligation is invalid: " <> shown failure
ExactProofFoundationLeafRequiresImplicitAuto location ->
at location
<> "a confined foundation claim requires an implicit Auto proof"
ExactProofFoundationLeafTargetMismatch location ->
at location <> "the claim does not exactly match a foundation axiom"
ExactProofFoundationLeafTargetAmbiguous location ->
at location <> "the claim matches more than one foundation axiom"
where
at location = locationToText location <> ": "
shown :: Show value => value -> Text
shown = Text.pack . show
data ExactLocalOrigin
= ExactAssumption
| ExactDerivedClaim
| ExactLocalDefinition
deriving stock (Show, Eq, Ord)
data PreparedLocal = PreparedLocal
!Backend.LocalPremiseOrdinal
!ExactLocalOrigin
!(Vector (Exact.ExactLocalId, CoreType))
!(ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId)
data PreparedJustification
= PreparedAuto
| PreparedReferences
!(NonEmpty SemanticFactOccurrenceFingerprint)
| PreparedLocalOnly
data PreparedDischarge
= PreparedVampireDischarge
!Location
!PreparedJustification
!(ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId)
!(Declaration.PreparedVampireObligation
Exact.ExactLocalId
ExactLocalOrigin)
| PreparedSetExtensionality
!Location
!(ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId)
data PreparedProof
= PreparedImplicitAuto !PreparedDischarge
| PreparedQed !PreparedDischarge
| PreparedOmitted
!Location
!(ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId)
| PreparedFix ![Exact.ExactLocalId] !PreparedProof
| PreparedAssume
!(ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId)
!PreparedProof
| PreparedTake
![Exact.ExactLocalId]
!(ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId)
!PreparedDischarge
!PreparedProof
| PreparedSetInduction
!(ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId)
!PreparedDischarge
| PreparedHave
!(ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId)
!PreparedDischarge
!PreparedProof
| PreparedSubclaim
!(ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId)
!PreparedProof
!PreparedProof
| PreparedDefine
!Exact.ExactLocalId
!(ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId)
!(ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId)
!PreparedProof
| PreparedDefineFunction
!Exact.ExactLocalId
!(ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId)
!(ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId)
!PreparedProof
| PreparedContradiction !PreparedDischarge
data PreparedExactProof = PreparedExactProof
!Location
!SemanticName
!(ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId)
!PreparedProof
!ProofSyntaxId
data PreparedFinalPreludeFoundationClaim =
PreparedFinalPreludeFoundationClaim
!Location
!SemanticName
!(ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId)
!FoundationAxiomTag
!ProofSyntaxId
preparedExactProofSyntaxId :: PreparedExactProof -> ProofSyntaxId
preparedExactProofSyntaxId
(PreparedExactProof _location _alias _target _proof syntax) =
syntax
preparedExactProofFirstOmission :: PreparedExactProof -> Maybe Location
preparedExactProofFirstOmission
(PreparedExactProof _location _alias _target proof _syntax) =
preparedProofFirstOmission proof
data PrepareState = PrepareState
{ prepareNextLocal :: !Natural
, prepareNextPremise :: !Natural
}
type Prepare =
StateT
PrepareState
(ExceptT ExactProofError (Declaration.LoweringDriver))
prepareExactProof
:: Raw.Block
-> Maybe Raw.Proof
-> Declaration.LoweringDriver
(Either ExactProofError PreparedExactProof)
prepareExactProof block explicitProof =
Except.runExceptT
(State.evalStateT prepare initialState)
where
initialState = PrepareState 0 0
prepare =
case block of
Raw.BlockClaim
_kind location _title (Raw.Marker marker)
(Raw.Claim assumptions statement) -> do
envelope <-
liftDriver
(Exact.prepareExactClaimEnvelope assumptions statement)
>>= either
(throwProof . ExactProofElaborationFailed)
pure
let targetCore = Exact.preparedExactClaimTarget envelope
unless (null (scopedCoreContext targetCore))
(throwProof
(ExactProofUnsupportedClaim location))
(context, openedGoal, identities) <-
openEnvelopeVariables
targetCore
(Exact.preparedExactClaimVariables envelope)
(Exact.preparedExactClaimContext envelope)
(locals, bodyGoal, antecedents) <-
openEnvelopeAntecedents
context
openedGoal
(Exact.preparedExactClaimAntecedentCount envelope)
bodyProof <-
case explicitProof of
Nothing ->
PreparedImplicitAuto
<$> prepareDischargeWith
DirectDischarge
[]
Nothing
location
context
locals
bodyGoal
Raw.JustificationEmpty
Just sourceProof ->
prepareProof
location
context
locals
(Just antecedents)
bodyGoal
sourceProof
let withAssumptions =
foldr PreparedAssume bodyProof antecedents
proof =
case identities of
[] -> withAssumptions
_ -> PreparedFix identities withAssumptions
pure
(PreparedExactProof
location
(semanticName marker)
targetCore
proof
(proofSyntaxId
(encodePreparedProof proof)))
_ ->
throwProof
(ExactProofUnsupportedClaim (locate block))
prepareFinalPreludeFoundationClaim
:: CheckedFoundation
-> Raw.Block
-> Maybe Raw.Proof
-> Declaration.LoweringDriver
(Either ExactProofError PreparedFinalPreludeFoundationClaim)
prepareFinalPreludeFoundationClaim foundation block explicitProof =
Except.runExceptT do
case (block, explicitProof) of
( Raw.BlockClaim
_kind location _title (Raw.Marker marker)
(Raw.Claim assumptions statement)
, Nothing
) -> do
envelope <-
Except.lift
(Exact.prepareExactClaimEnvelope
assumptions
statement)
>>= either
(Except.throwError
. ExactProofElaborationFailed)
pure
unless
( null (Exact.preparedExactClaimVariables envelope)
&& Exact.preparedExactClaimAntecedentCount envelope
== 0
)
(Except.throwError
(ExactProofFoundationLeafRequiresImplicitAuto
location))
let target = Exact.preparedExactClaimTarget envelope
matches =
[ tag
| tag <- [minBound .. maxBound]
, target == foundationTarget tag
]
tag <- case matches of
[] ->
Except.throwError
(ExactProofFoundationLeafTargetMismatch location)
[only] ->
pure only
_ ->
Except.throwError
(ExactProofFoundationLeafTargetAmbiguous location)
pure
(PreparedFinalPreludeFoundationClaim
location
(semanticName marker)
target
tag
(implicitAutoProofSyntaxId target))
(Raw.BlockClaim _kind location _title _marker _claim, Just{}) ->
Except.throwError
(ExactProofFoundationLeafRequiresImplicitAuto location)
_ ->
Except.throwError
(ExactProofUnsupportedClaim (locate block))
where
foundationTarget tag =
embedClosedCore []
(mapFrozenGlobals
absurd
(foundationAxiomFrozen foundation tag))
openEnvelopeVariables
:: ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId
-> [Raw.VarSymbol]
-> Exact.ExactBinderContext
-> Prepare
( Exact.ExactBinderContext
, ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId
, [Exact.ExactLocalId]
)
openEnvelopeVariables target variables preparedContext =
case NonEmpty.nonEmpty variables of
Nothing ->
pure (preparedContext, target, [])
Just nonempty -> do
(_unannotated, opened, identities) <-
openFixedVariables
Exact.emptyExactBinderContext
target
nonempty
let expected =
reverse
(fst <$> toList
(Exact.exactBinderContextSupport preparedContext))
unless
(identities == expected)
(impossible
"prepared claim annotations do not match opened binders")
pure (preparedContext, opened, identities)
openEnvelopeAntecedents
:: Exact.ExactBinderContext
-> ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId
-> Natural
-> Prepare
( [PreparedLocal]
, ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId
, [ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId]
)
openEnvelopeAntecedents context initialGoal initialCount =
go [] [] initialGoal initialCount
where
go locals antecedents goal 0 =
pure (locals, goal, antecedents)
go locals antecedents goal remaining = do
(antecedent, conclusion) <-
maybe
(impossible
"a prepared claim envelope has too few implications")
pure
(openScopedImplication goal)
local <- allocateLocal ExactAssumption context antecedent
go
(locals <> [local])
(antecedents <> [antecedent])
conclusion
(remaining - 1)
prepareProof
:: Location
-> Exact.ExactBinderContext
-> [PreparedLocal]
-- Only the initial proof carries set-induction antecedents.
-> Maybe [ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId]
-> ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId
-> Raw.Proof
-> Prepare PreparedProof
prepareProof fallback context locals inductionAntecedents goal = \case
Raw.Omitted location ->
pure (PreparedOmitted location goal)
Raw.Qed maybeLocation justification ->
PreparedQed
<$> prepareDischarge
(fromMaybe fallback maybeLocation)
context
locals
goal
justification
Raw.FixSymbolic location variables bound continuation -> do
(context', goal', identities) <-
openFixedVariables context goal variables
case bound of
Raw.Unbounded ->
PreparedFix identities
<$> prepareProof
fallback
context'
locals
Nothing
goal'
continuation
_ -> do
constraint <-
prepareSymbolicBoundConstraints
context' variables bound
prepareGuardedFix
fallback location context' locals goal'
identities constraint continuation
Raw.FixSuchThat location variables statement continuation -> do
(context', goal', identities) <-
openFixedVariables context goal variables
constraint <-
Exact.preparedExactPropositionCore
<$> prepareStatement context' statement
prepareGuardedFix
fallback location context' locals goal'
identities constraint continuation
Raw.Assume location statement continuation -> do
supplied <- prepareStatement context statement
when (isNothing (openScopedImplication goal))
(throwProof (ExactProofExpectedImplicationGoal location))
(assumption, conclusion) <-
maybe
(throwProof (ExactProofGoalStatementMismatch location))
pure
(openScopedAssumption
(Exact.preparedExactPropositionCore supplied)
goal)
local <- allocateLocal ExactAssumption context assumption
PreparedAssume assumption
<$> prepareProof
fallback
context
(locals <> [local])
Nothing
conclusion
continuation
Raw.TakeVar location variables bound statement justification continuation -> do
prepareSymbolicTake
fallback location context locals goal variables bound statement
justification continuation
Raw.TakeNoun location nounPhrase justification continuation ->
prepareNounTake
fallback location context locals goal nounPhrase
justification continuation
Raw.BySetInduction location variable continuation ->
case (inductionAntecedents, continuation) of
(Nothing, _proof) ->
throwProof
(ExactProofSetInductionNotOutermost location)
(Just antecedents, Raw.Qed maybeLocation justification) -> do
sourceVariable <-
case variable of
Just (Raw.TermExpr (Raw.ExprVar candidate)) ->
pure candidate
_ ->
throwProof
(ExactProofSetInductionVariableRequired
location)
selected <-
maybe
(throwProof
(ExactProofSetInductionVariableNotActive
location
sourceVariable))
pure
(Exact.exactBinderContextIndex
sourceVariable context)
let property =
foldr implyChecked goal antecedents
hypothesis <-
maybe
(throwProof
(ExactProofSetInductionGoalMismatch
location))
pure
(scopedSetInductionHypothesis selected property)
local <- allocateLocal ExactAssumption context hypothesis
PreparedSetInduction hypothesis
<$> prepareDischarge
(fromMaybe location maybeLocation)
context
(locals <> [local])
goal
justification
(Just _antecedents, _proof) ->
throwProof (ExactProofUnsupportedStep location)
Raw.Have location Nothing
(Raw.SymbolicExists _existential variables bound statement)
justification continuation ->
prepareSymbolicTake
fallback location context locals goal variables bound statement
justification continuation
Raw.Have location since statement justification continuation -> do
when (isJust since)
(throwProof (ExactProofUnsupportedStep location))
claim <-
Exact.preparedExactPropositionCore
<$> prepareStatement context statement
discharge <-
prepareDischarge
location context locals claim justification
local <- allocateLocal ExactDerivedClaim context claim
PreparedHave claim discharge
<$> prepareProof
fallback
context
(locals <> [local])
Nothing
goal
continuation
Raw.Subclaim location statement subproof continuation -> do
claim <-
Exact.preparedExactPropositionCore
<$> prepareStatement context statement
preparedSubproof <-
prepareProof
location
context
locals
Nothing
claim
subproof
local <- allocateLocal ExactDerivedClaim context claim
PreparedSubclaim claim preparedSubproof
<$> prepareProof
fallback
context
(locals <> [local])
Nothing
goal
continuation
Raw.Define _location variable expression continuation -> do
body <-
Exact.preparedExactSetExpressionCore
<$> ( liftDriver
(Exact.prepareExactSetExpression
context expression)
>>= either
(throwProof . ExactProofElaborationFailed)
pure
)
identity <- allocateLocalIdentity
context' <-
either
(throwProof . ExactProofElaborationFailed)
pure
(Exact.extendExactBinderContext
((identity, variable) :| [])
context)
separationCharacteristic <-
liftDriver
(Declaration.currentFoundationAxiomLowering
SeparationCharacteristic)
definition <-
maybe
(impossible
"an exact set expression did not form a local definition")
pure
(scopedSetDefinition separationCharacteristic body)
local <-
allocateLocal ExactLocalDefinition context' definition
PreparedDefine identity body definition
<$> prepareProof
fallback
context'
(locals <> [local])
Nothing
(weakenCheckedScopedCore TySet goal)
continuation
Raw.DefineFunction
location function argument value bound domain continuation -> do
unless (argument == bound)
(throwProof
(ExactProofLocalFunctionBinderMismatch (locate bound)))
when (function == argument)
(throwProof
(ExactProofLocalFunctionNameConflict (locate function)))
argumentIdentity <- allocateLocalIdentity
argumentContext <-
either
(throwProof . ExactProofElaborationFailed)
pure
(Exact.extendExactBinderContext
((argumentIdentity, argument) :| [])
context)
graph <-
liftDriver
(Exact.prepareExactLocalFunctionGraph
location context argumentContext domain value)
>>= either
(throwProof . ExactProofElaborationFailed)
pure
functionIdentity <- allocateLocalIdentity
functionContext <-
either
(throwProof . ExactProofElaborationFailed)
pure
(Exact.extendExactBinderContext
((functionIdentity, function) :| [])
context)
replacementCharacteristic <-
liftDriver
(Declaration.currentFoundationAxiomLowering
ReplacementCharacteristic)
definition <-
maybe
(impossible
"a checked replacement graph did not form a local definition")
pure
(scopedCharacteristicDefinition
replacementCharacteristic
(Exact.preparedExactLocalFunctionGraphCore graph)
( Exact.preparedExactLocalFunctionGraphDomain graph
:| [Exact.preparedExactLocalFunctionGraphMap graph]
))
local <-
allocateLocal ExactLocalDefinition functionContext definition
PreparedDefineFunction
functionIdentity
(Exact.preparedExactLocalFunctionGraphCore graph)
definition
<$> prepareProof
fallback
functionContext
(locals <> [local])
Nothing
(weakenCheckedScopedCore TySet goal)
continuation
Raw.Contradiction location justification -> do
unless
( scopedCoreType goal == TyProp
&& scopedCoreTerm goal == CFalsum
)
(throwProof
(ExactProofContradictionGoalMismatch location))
PreparedContradiction
<$> prepareDischargeWith
IndirectContradictionDischarge
[]
Nothing
location
context
locals
goal
justification
proof ->
throwProof
(ExactProofUnsupportedStep
(proofLocation fallback proof))
where
implyChecked antecedent conclusion =
fromMaybe
(impossible "an exact claim antecedent changed context")
(implyScopedCore antecedent conclusion)
prepareGuardedFix
:: Location
-> Location
-> Exact.ExactBinderContext
-> [PreparedLocal]
-> ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId
-> [Exact.ExactLocalId]
-> ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId
-> Raw.Proof
-> Prepare PreparedProof
prepareGuardedFix
fallback location context locals goal identities constraint continuation = do
(antecedent, conclusion) <-
maybe
(throwProof (ExactProofExpectedImplicationGoal location))
pure
(openScopedImplication goal)
unless (constraint == antecedent)
(throwProof (ExactProofGoalStatementMismatch location))
local <- allocateLocal ExactAssumption context constraint
prepared <-
prepareProof
fallback
context
(locals <> [local])
Nothing
conclusion
continuation
pure (PreparedFix identities (PreparedAssume constraint prepared))
prepareSymbolicBoundConstraints
:: Exact.ExactBinderContext
-> NonEmpty Raw.VarSymbol
-> Raw.Bound
-> Prepare (ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId)
prepareSymbolicBoundConstraints context variables bound =
Exact.preparedExactPropositionCore
<$> ( liftDriver
(Exact.prepareExactSymbolicBoundConstraints
context variables bound)
>>= either
(throwProof . ExactProofElaborationFailed)
pure
)
prepareSymbolicTake
:: Location
-> Location
-> Exact.ExactBinderContext
-> [PreparedLocal]
-> ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId
-> NonEmpty Raw.VarSymbol
-> Raw.Bound
-> Raw.Stmt
-> Raw.Justification
-> Raw.Proof
-> Prepare PreparedProof
prepareSymbolicTake
fallback location context locals goal variables bound statement
justification continuation = do
identities <- traverse (const allocateLocalIdentity) variables
context' <-
either
(throwProof . ExactProofElaborationFailed)
pure
(Exact.extendExactBinderContext
(NonEmpty.zip identities variables)
context)
witness <-
Exact.preparedExactPropositionCore
<$> ( liftDriver
(Exact.prepareExactSymbolicWitnessConstraints
context' variables bound statement)
>>= either
(throwProof . ExactProofElaborationFailed)
pure
)
prepareTake
fallback location context locals goal context'
(toList identities) witness justification continuation
prepareNounTake
:: Location
-> Location
-> Exact.ExactBinderContext
-> [PreparedLocal]
-> ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId
-> Raw.NounPhrase []
-> Raw.Justification
-> Raw.Proof
-> Prepare PreparedProof
prepareNounTake
fallback location context locals goal nounPhrase
justification continuation = do
(identities, context') <-
case nounPhrase of
Raw.NounPhrase _left _noun variables _right _suchThat ->
case NonEmpty.nonEmpty variables of
Just binders -> do
identities <-
traverse (const allocateLocalIdentity) binders
context' <-
either
(throwProof . ExactProofElaborationFailed)
pure
(Exact.extendExactBinderContext
(NonEmpty.zip identities binders)
context)
pure (toList identities, context')
Nothing -> do
identity <- allocateLocalIdentity
context' <-
either
(throwProof . ExactProofElaborationFailed)
pure
(Exact.extendExactAnonymousBinderContext
identity context)
pure ([identity], context')
witness <-
Exact.preparedExactPropositionCore
<$> ( liftDriver
(Exact.prepareExactNounWitnessConstraints
context' nounPhrase)
>>= either
(throwProof . ExactProofElaborationFailed)
pure
)
prepareTake
fallback location context locals goal context'
identities witness justification continuation
prepareTake
:: Location
-> Location
-> Exact.ExactBinderContext
-> [PreparedLocal]
-> ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId
-> Exact.ExactBinderContext
-> [Exact.ExactLocalId]
-> ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId
-> Raw.Justification
-> Raw.Proof
-> Prepare PreparedProof
prepareTake
fallback location context locals goal witnessContext
identities witness justification continuation = do
let witnessCount = length identities
existence = closeTakenWitnesses witnessCount witness
goal' = weakenForTakenWitnesses witnessCount goal
discharge <-
prepareDischarge
location context locals existence justification
local <- allocateLocal ExactAssumption witnessContext witness
PreparedTake identities witness discharge
<$> prepareProof
fallback
witnessContext
(locals <> [local])
Nothing
goal'
continuation
-- The discharged existential and the opened witness premise are the same
-- checked proposition viewed on opposite sides of existential elimination.
closeTakenWitnesses
:: Int
-> ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId
-> ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId
closeTakenWitnesses binderCount = go binderCount
where
go 0 proposition = proposition
go remaining proposition =
go (remaining - 1)
(fromMaybe
(impossible "a taken witness has no checked binder")
(closeScopedExists proposition))
weakenForTakenWitnesses
:: Int
-> ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId
-> ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId
weakenForTakenWitnesses binderCount = go binderCount
where
go 0 proposition = proposition
go remaining proposition =
go (remaining - 1)
(weakenCheckedScopedCore TySet proposition)
openFixedVariables
:: Exact.ExactBinderContext
-> ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId
-> NonEmpty Raw.VarSymbol
-> Prepare
( Exact.ExactBinderContext
, ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId
, [Exact.ExactLocalId]
)
openFixedVariables initialContext initialGoal variables =
foldM openOne
(initialContext, initialGoal, [])
(toList variables)
where
openOne (context, goal, identities) variable = do
(binderType, body) <-
maybe
(throwProof
(ExactProofExpectedUniversalGoal
(locate variable)))
pure
(openScopedForall goal)
unless (binderType == TySet)
(throwProof
(ExactProofExpectedUniversalGoal
(locate variable)))
identity <- allocateLocalIdentity
context' <-
either
(throwProof . ExactProofElaborationFailed)
pure
(Exact.extendExactBinderContext
((identity, variable) :| [])
context)
pure (context', body, identities <> [identity])
allocateLocalIdentity :: Prepare Exact.ExactLocalId
allocateLocalIdentity = do
state <- State.get
State.put
state
{ prepareNextLocal = prepareNextLocal state + 1
}
pure (Exact.exactLocalId (prepareNextLocal state))
allocateLocal
:: ExactLocalOrigin
-> Exact.ExactBinderContext
-> ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId
-> Prepare PreparedLocal
allocateLocal origin context proposition = do
state <- State.get
State.put
state
{ prepareNextPremise = prepareNextPremise state + 1
}
pure
(PreparedLocal
(Backend.localPremiseOrdinal
(prepareNextPremise state))
origin
(Exact.exactBinderContextSupport context)
proposition)
prepareDischarge
:: Location
-> Exact.ExactBinderContext
-> [PreparedLocal]
-> ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId
-> Raw.Justification
-> Prepare PreparedDischarge
prepareDischarge location context locals goal justification =
prepareDischargeWith
DirectDischarge
[] Nothing location context locals goal justification
data DischargeMode
= DirectDischarge
| IndirectContradictionDischarge
prepareDischargeWith
:: DischargeMode
-> [FoundationAxiomTag]
-> Maybe Declaration.VampirePremiseSelection
-> Location
-> Exact.ExactBinderContext
-> [PreparedLocal]
-> ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId
-> Raw.Justification
-> Prepare PreparedDischarge
prepareDischargeWith
dischargeMode auxiliaries selectionOverride
location context locals goal justification =
case justification of
Raw.JustificationSetExt -> do
(leftToRight, rightToLeft) <-
maybe
(throwProof
(ExactProofSetExtensionalityGoalMismatch location))
pure
(splitScopedSetEquality goal)
unless
( hasDerivedLocal leftToRight
&& hasDerivedLocal rightToLeft
)
(throwProof
(ExactProofSetExtensionalityDirectionsUnavailable
location))
pure (PreparedSetExtensionality location goal)
_ -> do
preparedJustification <-
prepareJustification location justification
prepared <-
liftDriver
(prepareObligation
(Exact.exactBinderContextSupport context)
goal
(toScopedPremise <$> locals)
auxiliaries
(fromMaybe
(vampirePremiseSelection preparedJustification)
selectionOverride))
>>= either
(throwProof
. ExactProofObligationPreparationFailed location)
pure
pure
(PreparedVampireDischarge
location
preparedJustification
goal
prepared)
where
prepareObligation =
case dischargeMode of
DirectDischarge ->
Declaration.prepareScopedVampireObligationLowering
IndirectContradictionDischarge ->
Declaration.prepareScopedContradictionObligationLowering
hasDerivedLocal proposition =
any
(\case
PreparedLocal
_ordinal ExactDerivedClaim _support local ->
local == proposition
PreparedLocal{} ->
False)
locals
toScopedPremise
(PreparedLocal ordinal origin support proposition) =
Declaration.scopedVampirePremise
ordinal origin support proposition
prepareJustification
:: Location
-> Raw.Justification
-> Prepare PreparedJustification
prepareJustification _location Raw.JustificationEmpty =
pure PreparedAuto
prepareJustification location (Raw.JustificationRef markers) = do
resolved <- traverse (resolveReference location) (toList markers)
let unique = stableUnique resolved
case unique of
[] ->
impossible "a nonempty citation list resolved to no facts"
first : rest ->
pure (PreparedReferences (first :| rest))
prepareJustification _location Raw.JustificationLocal =
pure PreparedLocalOnly
prepareJustification location Raw.JustificationSetExt =
throwProof (ExactProofUnsupportedStep location)
vampirePremiseSelection
:: PreparedJustification
-> Declaration.VampirePremiseSelection
vampirePremiseSelection = \case
PreparedAuto ->
Declaration.VampireImplicitPremises
PreparedReferences fingerprints ->
Declaration.VampireExplicitPremises fingerprints
PreparedLocalOnly ->
Declaration.VampireLocalPremises
resolveReference
:: Location
-> Raw.Marker
-> Prepare SemanticFactOccurrenceFingerprint
resolveReference location marker@(Raw.Marker name) = do
resolved <-
liftDriver
(Declaration.resolveVisibleFactAliasLowering
(semanticName name))
maybe
(throwProof
(ExactProofUnknownReference location marker))
pure
resolved
prepareStatement
:: Exact.ExactBinderContext
-> Raw.Stmt
-> Prepare Exact.PreparedExactProposition
prepareStatement context statement =
liftDriver
(Exact.prepareExactProposition context statement)
>>= either
(throwProof . ExactProofElaborationFailed)
pure
data CheckedExactProofAuthorization = CheckedExactProofAuthorization
!PreparedProof
!Bool
lowerPreparedExactProof
:: PreparedExactProof
-> Declaration.LoweringDriver
(Either
Declaration.DeclarationError
(Declaration.CheckedDeclaration CheckedExactProofAuthorization))
lowerPreparedExactProof
(PreparedExactProof _location alias target proof syntax) =
fmap checked
<$> Declaration.prepareCandidateSpecLowering
[] target SearchEligible [alias]
where
checked spec =
Declaration.checkedProofDeclaration
syntax [] [] [] []
[Declaration.checkedCandidate spec planning :| []]
(CheckedExactProofAuthorization
proof
(isJust (preparedProofFirstOmission proof)))
where
requests = plannedProofRequests proof
planning
| isJust (preparedProofFirstOmission proof) =
Declaration.checkedOmittedPlanning requests []
| otherwise =
Declaration.checkedSourceProofPlanning requests []
authorizeCheckedExactProof
:: CheckedExactProofAuthorization
-> [NonEmpty Declaration.ReservedCandidate]
-> Declaration.Declaration ()
authorizeCheckedExactProof
(CheckedExactProofAuthorization proof hasOmission) = \case
[candidate :| []]
| hasOmission ->
Declaration.authorizeOmittedCandidate
candidate
(executePreparedProof proof)
| otherwise ->
Declaration.authorizeVampireCandidate
candidate
(executePreparedProof proof)
stages ->
Declaration.failDeclaration
(Declaration.CheckedAuthorizationCandidateShapeMismatch
1 (length stages))
data CheckedFinalPreludeFoundationAuthorization =
CheckedFinalPreludeFoundationAuthorization !FoundationAxiomTag
lowerPreparedFinalPreludeFoundationClaim
:: PreparedFinalPreludeFoundationClaim
-> Declaration.LoweringDriver
(Either
Declaration.DeclarationError
(Declaration.CheckedDeclaration
CheckedFinalPreludeFoundationAuthorization))
lowerPreparedFinalPreludeFoundationClaim
(PreparedFinalPreludeFoundationClaim
_location alias target tag syntax) =
fmap checked
<$> Declaration.prepareCandidateSpecLowering
[] target SearchEligible [alias]
where
checked spec =
Declaration.checkedProofDeclaration
syntax [] [] [] []
[ Declaration.checkedCandidate spec
(Declaration.checkedKernelPlanning
(Authority.FoundationLeaf tag) [])
:| []
]
(CheckedFinalPreludeFoundationAuthorization tag)
authorizeCheckedFinalPreludeFoundationClaim
:: CheckedFinalPreludeFoundationAuthorization
-> [NonEmpty Declaration.ReservedCandidate]
-> Declaration.Declaration ()
authorizeCheckedFinalPreludeFoundationClaim
(CheckedFinalPreludeFoundationAuthorization tag) = \case
[candidate :| []] ->
Declaration.authorizeKernelConstructionCandidate
(Authority.FoundationLeaf tag)
candidate
(pure (foundationFactDerivation tag))
stages ->
Declaration.failDeclaration
(Declaration.CheckedAuthorizationCandidateShapeMismatch
1 (length stages))
preparedProofFirstOmission :: PreparedProof -> Maybe Location
preparedProofFirstOmission = \case
PreparedImplicitAuto{} -> Nothing
PreparedQed{} -> Nothing
PreparedOmitted location _goal -> Just location
PreparedFix _identities continuation ->
preparedProofFirstOmission continuation
PreparedAssume _antecedent continuation ->
preparedProofFirstOmission continuation
PreparedTake _identities _witness _discharge continuation ->
preparedProofFirstOmission continuation
PreparedSetInduction _hypothesis _discharge -> Nothing
PreparedHave _claim _discharge continuation ->
preparedProofFirstOmission continuation
PreparedSubclaim _claim subproof continuation ->
preparedProofFirstOmission subproof
<|> preparedProofFirstOmission continuation
PreparedDefine _identity _body _definition continuation ->
preparedProofFirstOmission continuation
PreparedDefineFunction _identity _graph _definition continuation ->
preparedProofFirstOmission continuation
PreparedContradiction{} -> Nothing
plannedProofRequests
:: PreparedProof
-> [Declaration.CheckedPlannedVampireRequest]
plannedProofRequests = \case
PreparedImplicitAuto discharge -> plannedDischargeRequests discharge
PreparedQed discharge -> plannedDischargeRequests discharge
PreparedOmitted{} -> []
PreparedFix _identities continuation ->
plannedProofRequests continuation
PreparedAssume _antecedent continuation ->
plannedProofRequests continuation
PreparedTake _identities _witness discharge continuation ->
plannedDischargeRequests discharge <> plannedProofRequests continuation
PreparedSetInduction _hypothesis discharge ->
plannedDischargeRequests discharge
PreparedHave _claim discharge continuation ->
plannedDischargeRequests discharge <> plannedProofRequests continuation
PreparedSubclaim _claim subproof continuation ->
plannedProofRequests subproof <> plannedProofRequests continuation
PreparedDefine _identity _body _definition continuation ->
plannedProofRequests continuation
PreparedDefineFunction _identity _graph _definition continuation ->
plannedProofRequests continuation
PreparedContradiction discharge ->
plannedDischargeRequests discharge
plannedDischargeRequests
:: PreparedDischarge
-> [Declaration.CheckedPlannedVampireRequest]
plannedDischargeRequests = \case
PreparedVampireDischarge location _justification _goal obligation ->
[Declaration.checkedPlannedVampireRequest location obligation]
PreparedSetExtensionality{} -> []
executePreparedProof
:: PreparedProof
-> Declaration.CandidateProof ()
executePreparedProof = \case
PreparedImplicitAuto discharge ->
executeDischarge discharge
PreparedQed discharge ->
executeDischarge discharge
PreparedOmitted _location _goal ->
Declaration.recordOmittedUse
PreparedFix _identities continuation ->
executePreparedProof continuation
PreparedAssume _antecedent continuation ->
executePreparedProof continuation
PreparedTake _identities _witness discharge continuation -> do
executeDischarge discharge
executePreparedProof continuation
PreparedSetInduction _hypothesis discharge ->
executeDischarge discharge
PreparedHave _claim discharge continuation -> do
executeDischarge discharge
executePreparedProof continuation
PreparedSubclaim _claim subproof continuation -> do
executePreparedProof subproof
executePreparedProof continuation
PreparedDefine _identity _body _definition continuation ->
executePreparedProof continuation
PreparedDefineFunction _identity _graph _definition continuation ->
executePreparedProof continuation
PreparedContradiction discharge ->
executeDischarge discharge
executeDischarge
:: PreparedDischarge
-> Declaration.CandidateProof ()
executeDischarge
(PreparedVampireDischarge
location _justification _goal obligation) =
Declaration.locateProofObligation location
(Declaration.acceptPreparedVampireObligation obligation)
executeDischarge PreparedSetExtensionality{} =
pure ()
encodePreparedProof :: PreparedProof -> ByteString
encodePreparedProof =
encodeCache . putPreparedProof
putPreparedProof :: PreparedProof -> CachePut
putPreparedProof = \case
PreparedImplicitAuto discharge -> do
putCacheTag 0x00
putPreparedDischarge discharge
PreparedQed discharge -> do
putCacheTag 0x01
putPreparedDischarge discharge
PreparedOmitted _location goal -> do
putCacheTag 0x06
putScopedProposition goal
PreparedFix identities continuation -> do
putCacheTag 0x02
putCacheList
(putCacheNatural . Exact.exactLocalIdValue)
identities
putPreparedProof continuation
PreparedAssume antecedent continuation -> do
putCacheTag 0x03
putScopedProposition antecedent
putPreparedProof continuation
PreparedTake identities witness discharge continuation -> do
putCacheTag 0x08
putCacheList
(putCacheNatural . Exact.exactLocalIdValue)
identities
putScopedProposition witness
putPreparedDischarge discharge
putPreparedProof continuation
PreparedSetInduction hypothesis discharge -> do
putCacheTag 0x07
putScopedProposition hypothesis
putPreparedDischarge discharge
PreparedHave claim discharge continuation -> do
putCacheTag 0x04
putScopedProposition claim
putPreparedDischarge discharge
putPreparedProof continuation
PreparedSubclaim claim subproof continuation -> do
putCacheTag 0x05
putScopedProposition claim
putPreparedProof subproof
putPreparedProof continuation
PreparedDefine identity body definition continuation -> do
putCacheTag 0x09
putCacheNatural (Exact.exactLocalIdValue identity)
putScopedTerm body
putScopedProposition definition
putPreparedProof continuation
PreparedContradiction discharge -> do
putCacheTag 0x0a
putPreparedDischarge discharge
PreparedDefineFunction identity graph definition continuation -> do
putCacheTag 0x0b
putCacheNatural (Exact.exactLocalIdValue identity)
putScopedTerm graph
putScopedProposition definition
putPreparedProof continuation
putPreparedDischarge :: PreparedDischarge -> CachePut
putPreparedDischarge
(PreparedVampireDischarge
_location justification goal _obligation) = do
putPreparedDischargeSyntax justification goal
putPreparedDischarge
(PreparedSetExtensionality _location goal) = do
putCacheTag 0x03
putScopedProposition goal
putPreparedDischargeSyntax
:: PreparedJustification
-> ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId
-> CachePut
putPreparedDischargeSyntax justification goal = do
putPreparedJustification justification
putScopedProposition goal
implicitAutoProofSyntaxId
:: ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId
-> ProofSyntaxId
implicitAutoProofSyntaxId goal =
proofSyntaxId
(encodeCache do
putCacheTag 0x00
putPreparedDischargeSyntax PreparedAuto goal)
putPreparedJustification :: PreparedJustification -> CachePut
putPreparedJustification = \case
PreparedAuto ->
putCacheTag 0x00
PreparedReferences fingerprints -> do
putCacheTag 0x01
putCacheList
putSemanticFactOccurrenceFingerprintCache
(toList fingerprints)
PreparedLocalOnly ->
putCacheTag 0x02
putScopedProposition
:: ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId
-> CachePut
putScopedProposition proposition = do
putCacheList putCoreTypeCache
(scopedCoreContext proposition)
putCanonicalTermCache putObjectIdCache
(scopedCoreTerm proposition)
putScopedTerm
:: ScopedCheckedCore ObjectId
-> CachePut
putScopedTerm term = do
putCacheList putCoreTypeCache
(scopedCoreContext term)
putCoreTypeCache (scopedCoreType term)
putCanonicalTermCache putObjectIdCache
(scopedCoreTerm term)
proofLocation :: Location -> Raw.Proof -> Location
proofLocation fallback = \case
Raw.Omitted location -> location
Raw.Qed maybeLocation _justification ->
fromMaybe fallback maybeLocation
Raw.Contradiction location _justification -> location
Raw.ByCase location _cases -> location
Raw.ByContradiction location _proof -> location
Raw.BySetInduction location _term _proof -> location
Raw.ByOrdInduction location _proof -> location
Raw.Assume location _statement _proof -> location
Raw.FixSymbolic location _variables _bound _proof -> location
Raw.FixSuchThat location _variables _statement _proof -> location
Raw.Calc location _quantifier _calculation _proof -> location
Raw.TakeVar location _variables _bound _statement _justification _proof ->
location
Raw.TakeNoun location _noun _justification _proof -> location
Raw.Have location _since _statement _justification _proof -> location
Raw.Suffices location _statement _justification _proof -> location
Raw.Subclaim location _statement _subproof _proof -> location
Raw.Define location _variable _expression _proof -> location
Raw.DefineFunction location _function _argument _value _bound _domain _proof ->
location
Raw.DefineFunctionLocal
location _function _argument _value _bound _target _rules _proof ->
location
throwProof :: ExactProofError -> Prepare value
throwProof =
State.lift . Except.throwError
liftDriver
:: Declaration.LoweringDriver value
-> Prepare value
liftDriver =
State.lift . Except.lift
stableUnique :: Ord value => [value] -> [value]
stableUnique =
reverse . snd
. foldl'
(\(seen, reversed) value ->
if value `Set.member` seen
then (seen, reversed)
else
( Set.insert value seen
, value : reversed
))
(Set.empty, [])
|