1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
|
{-# LANGUAGE NoImplicitPrelude #-}
{-# LANGUAGE OverloadedStrings #-}
module Test.Unit.Backend (unitTests) where
import Base hiding (Empty)
import Checking.Backend.Problem
import Checking.Backend.Tptp
import Checking.Core
import Checking.Foundation qualified as Foundation
import Provers
import Tptp.UnsortedFirstOrder qualified as Tptp
import Data.Map.Strict qualified as Map
import Data.Text qualified as Text
import Data.Vector (Vector)
import Data.Vector qualified as Vector
import Numeric.Natural (Natural)
import Test.Tasty
import Test.Tasty.HUnit
data TestGlobal
= FirstOrderPredicate
| HigherOrderPredicate
deriving (Show, Eq, Ord)
testGlobalType :: TestGlobal -> Maybe CoreType
testGlobalType = \case
FirstOrderPredicate ->
Just (TySet `TyArrow` TyProp)
HigherOrderPredicate ->
Just
((TySet `TyArrow` TyProp)
`TyArrow` TyProp)
data TestLocal
= ObjectLocal
| PredicateLocal
deriving (Show, Eq, Ord)
unitTests :: TestTree
unitTests =
testGroup "Typed backend problem"
[ testCase
"projects proposition equality as equivalence"
classifiesPropositionEquality
, testCase
"projects exact ambient support"
projectsExactAmbientSupport
, testCase
"routes implicit, explicit, and local-only problems"
routesCompleteProblems
, testCase
"admits only checked implicit set constructions"
admitsImplicitSetConstructions
, testCase
"renders checked FOF and TH0 problems"
rendersCheckedProblems
]
classifiesPropositionEquality :: Assertion
classifiesPropositionEquality = do
proposition <-
checkedProposition
Vector.empty
(CEq TyProp CFalsum CFalsum)
capability <-
either
(assertFailure . show)
pure
(classifySupportedProposition
testGlobalType
proposition)
case capability of
FofProjectable{} ->
pure ()
RequiresTh0 exclusions ->
assertFailure
("proposition equality was not projected: "
<> show exclusions)
projectsExactAmbientSupport :: Assertion
projectsExactAmbientSupport = do
let term :: CanonicalTerm Void
term =
CForall TySet
(CEq TySet
(CBound 1)
(CBound 3))
scoped <-
either
(assertFailure . show)
pure
(checkScopedCanonicalCore
(const Nothing)
[TySet, TySet, TySet]
term)
projected <-
either
(assertFailure . show)
pure
(projectSupportedProposition
(const Nothing)
(Vector.fromList
[ (0 :: Int, TySet)
, (1, TySet)
, (2, TySet)
])
scoped)
assertEqual
"unused middle support is removed"
(Vector.fromList
[ (0 :: Int, TySet)
, (2, TySet)
])
(supportedPropositionSupport projected)
assertEqual
"indices are remapped below nested binders"
(CForall TySet
(CEq TySet
(CBound 1)
(CBound 2)))
(supportedPropositionTerm projected)
routesCompleteProblems :: Assertion
routesCompleteProblems = do
fofFact <-
checkedBackendFact
(0 :: Int)
firstOrderClaim
th0Fact <-
checkedBackendFact
(1 :: Int)
higherOrderClaim
let fofFacts =
Vector.singleton fofFact
th0Facts =
Vector.singleton th0Fact
claim <-
checkedProposition
(Vector.singleton
(ObjectLocal, TySet))
(CApp
(CGlobal FirstOrderPredicate)
(CBound 0))
firstOrderLocal <-
checkedLocalPremise
0
"first-order local"
claim
higherOrderLocalProposition <-
checkedProposition
(Vector.singleton
(PredicateLocal,
TySet `TyArrow` TyProp))
(CApp
(CGlobal HigherOrderPredicate)
(CBound 0))
higherOrderLocal <-
checkedLocalPremise
1
"higher-order local"
higherOrderLocalProposition
implicit <-
planned
fofFacts
claim
[higherOrderLocal, firstOrderLocal]
[]
ImplicitPremiseSelection
assertEqual "implicit route" RouteFof
(typedProblemRoute implicit)
assertEqual "implicit FOF globals" [0]
(typedBackendFactReference
<$> toList
(typedProblemGlobalPremises
implicit))
assertEqual "first-order local only" [0]
(localPremiseOrdinalValue
. typedLocalPremiseOrdinal
<$> toList
(typedProblemLocalPremises
implicit))
explicitFof <-
planned
fofFacts
claim
[firstOrderLocal]
[]
ExplicitGlobalPremiseSelection
assertEqual "explicit FOF route" RouteFof
(typedProblemRoute explicitFof)
explicitTh0 <-
planned
th0Facts
claim
[firstOrderLocal]
[]
ExplicitGlobalPremiseSelection
assertEqual "explicit TH0 route" RouteTh0
(typedProblemRoute explicitTh0)
localOnly <-
planned
Vector.empty
claim
[higherOrderLocal, firstOrderLocal]
[]
LocalOnlyPremiseSelection
assertEqual "local-only TH0 route" RouteTh0
(typedProblemRoute localOnly)
assertEqual "local order restored" [0, 1]
(localPremiseOrdinalValue
. typedLocalPremiseOrdinal
<$> toList
(typedProblemLocalPremises
localOnly))
assertEqual
"complete ambient local inventory"
(Map.fromList
[ (ObjectLocal, TySet)
, (PredicateLocal,
TySet `TyArrow` TyProp)
])
(typedProblemLocalTypes localOnly)
case planTypedProblem
testGlobalType
Vector.empty
claim
[firstOrderLocal, firstOrderLocal]
[]
LocalOnlyPremiseSelection of
Left
(TypedProblemDuplicateLocalPremiseOrdinal
duplicateOrdinal) ->
assertEqual
"duplicate local ordinal"
0
(localPremiseOrdinalValue
duplicateOrdinal)
result ->
assertFailure
("expected duplicate local ordinal error, got "
<> showProblemResult result)
higherOrderClaimProposition <-
checkedProposition
Vector.empty
higherOrderClaim
case planTypedProblem
testGlobalType
fofFacts
higherOrderClaimProposition
[]
[]
ImplicitPremiseSelection of
Left
TypedProblemExplicitHigherOrderJustificationRequired{} ->
pure ()
result ->
assertFailure
("expected explicit higher-order error, got "
<> showProblemResult result)
checkedFoundationValue <-
either
(assertFailure . show)
pure
Foundation.checkedFoundation
case planTypedProblem
testGlobalType
fofFacts
claim
[]
[typedFoundationAuxiliaryInput
checkedFoundationValue
Foundation.SeparationCharacteristic]
ImplicitPremiseSelection of
Left
TypedProblemExplicitHigherOrderJustificationRequired{} ->
pure ()
result ->
assertFailure
("expected implicit higher-order auxiliary error, got "
<> showProblemResult result)
unusedContext <-
either
(assertFailure . show)
pure
(checkScopedCanonicalCore
testGlobalType
[TySet `TyArrow` TyProp]
firstOrderClaim)
case supportedProposition
(Vector.singleton
(PredicateLocal,
TySet `TyArrow` TyProp))
unusedContext of
Left (UnusedSupportedLocal PredicateLocal) ->
pure ()
Left err ->
assertFailure
("unexpected exact-support error: "
<> show err)
Right _ ->
assertFailure
"unused ambient local entered exact support"
where
planned selectedFacts claim locals auxiliaries selection =
either
(assertFailure . show)
pure
(planTypedProblem
testGlobalType
selectedFacts
claim
locals
auxiliaries
selection)
showProblemResult = \case
Left err ->
show err
Right problem ->
show (typedProblemRoute problem)
admitsImplicitSetConstructions :: Assertion
admitsImplicitSetConstructions = do
checkedFoundationValue <-
either
(assertFailure . show)
pure
Foundation.checkedFoundation
let separation =
CApp
(CApp
(CIntrinsic Sep)
(CIntrinsic Empty))
(CLam TySet
(CApp
(CGlobal HigherOrderPredicate)
(CLam TySet CFalsum)))
separationClaim =
CEq TySet separation separation
filteredDomain =
CApp
(CApp
(CIntrinsic Sep)
(CBound 0))
(CLam TySet
(CEq TySet (CBound 0) (CBound 0)))
innerReplacement =
CApp
(CApp (CIntrinsic Repl) filteredDomain)
(CLam TySet (CBound 0))
functionalReplacement =
CApp
(CIntrinsic FamilyUnion)
(CApp
(CApp
(CIntrinsic Repl)
(CIntrinsic Empty))
(CLam TySet innerReplacement))
replacementClaim =
CEq TySet functionalReplacement functionalReplacement
replacementTags =
[ Foundation.FamilyUnionCharacteristic
, Foundation.SeparationCharacteristic
, Foundation.ReplacementCharacteristic
]
auxiliary tag =
typedFoundationAuxiliaryInput
checkedFoundationValue tag
plan selected claim locals tags =
planTypedProblem
testGlobalType
selected
claim
locals
(auxiliary <$> tags)
ImplicitPremiseSelection
separationProposition <-
checkedProposition Vector.empty separationClaim
separationProblem <-
either
(assertFailure . show)
pure
(plan
Vector.empty
separationProposition
[]
[Foundation.SeparationCharacteristic])
assertEqual "separation implicit route" RouteTh0
(typedProblemRoute separationProblem)
assertEqual "separation characteristic only"
[Foundation.SeparationCharacteristic]
(typedProblemAuxiliaryTag
<$> toList (typedProblemAuxiliaries separationProblem))
assertEqual "separation selects no global premise"
0
(Vector.length (typedProblemGlobalPremises separationProblem))
replacementProposition <-
checkedProposition Vector.empty replacementClaim
replacementProblem <-
either
(assertFailure . show)
pure
(plan
Vector.empty
replacementProposition
[]
replacementTags)
assertEqual "functional replacement implicit route" RouteTh0
(typedProblemRoute replacementProblem)
assertEqual "functional replacement exact helper set"
replacementTags
(typedProblemAuxiliaryTag
<$> toList (typedProblemAuxiliaries replacementProblem))
firstOrderProposition <-
checkedProposition Vector.empty firstOrderClaim
firstOrderLocal <-
checkedLocalPremise 0 "first-order" firstOrderProposition
separationLocal <-
checkedLocalPremise 2 "separation" separationProposition
unrelatedLocalProposition <-
checkedProposition
(Vector.singleton
(PredicateLocal, TySet `TyArrow` TyProp))
(CApp
(CGlobal HigherOrderPredicate)
(CBound 0))
unrelatedLocal <-
checkedLocalPremise 1 "unrelated higher-order" unrelatedLocalProposition
localProblem <-
either
(assertFailure . show)
pure
(plan
Vector.empty
firstOrderProposition
[unrelatedLocal, separationLocal, firstOrderLocal]
[Foundation.SeparationCharacteristic])
assertEqual "construction local promotes the complete problem" RouteTh0
(typedProblemRoute localProblem)
assertEqual "unrelated higher-order local remains unselected"
[0, 2]
( localPremiseOrdinalValue
. typedLocalPremiseOrdinal
<$> toList (typedProblemLocalPremises localProblem)
)
higherOrderFact <- checkedBackendFact (1 :: Int) higherOrderClaim
expectImplicitHigherOrderRejection
"implicit higher-order global remains forbidden"
(plan
(Vector.singleton higherOrderFact)
separationProposition
[]
[Foundation.SeparationCharacteristic])
ordinaryHigherOrder <-
checkedProposition Vector.empty
(CEq TySet
(CApp
(CIntrinsic SetChoose)
(CLam TySet CFalsum))
(CIntrinsic Empty))
expectImplicitHigherOrderRejection
"ordinary implicit higher-order target remains forbidden"
(plan Vector.empty ordinaryHigherOrder [] [])
mixedHigherOrder <-
checkedProposition Vector.empty
(CImp
separationClaim
(supportedPropositionTerm ordinaryHigherOrder))
expectImplicitHigherOrderRejection
"construction does not admit another higher-order intrinsic"
(plan
Vector.empty
mixedHigherOrder
[]
[Foundation.SeparationCharacteristic])
expectImplicitHigherOrderRejection
"auxiliary tag alone grants no construction permission"
(plan
Vector.empty
firstOrderProposition
[]
[Foundation.SeparationCharacteristic])
where
expectImplicitHigherOrderRejection label = \case
Left TypedProblemExplicitHigherOrderJustificationRequired{} ->
pure ()
Left err ->
assertFailure (label <> ": unexpected error " <> show err)
Right problem ->
assertFailure
(label <> ": unexpectedly routed "
<> show (typedProblemRoute problem))
rendersCheckedProblems :: Assertion
rendersCheckedProblems = do
fofFact <-
checkedBackendFact
(0 :: Int)
firstOrderClaim
th0Fact <-
checkedBackendFact
(1 :: Int)
higherOrderClaim
claim <-
checkedProposition
(Vector.singleton
(ObjectLocal, TySet))
(CApp
(CGlobal FirstOrderPredicate)
(CBound 0))
fofProblem <-
planned
(Vector.singleton fofFact)
claim
ImplicitPremiseSelection
th0Problem <-
planned
(Vector.singleton th0Fact)
claim
ExplicitGlobalPremiseSelection
preparedFof <-
either
(assertFailure . show)
pure
(prepareTypedTptpProblem
fofProblem)
preparedTh0 <-
either
(assertFailure . show)
pure
(prepareTypedTptpProblem
th0Problem)
proverTask <-
either
(assertFailure . show)
pure
(prepareTypedProverTask
DirectTask
th0Problem)
assertEqual "FOF route" RouteFof
(preparedTypedTptpRoute preparedFof)
assertBool "FOF formulas"
("fof(zf_h0,axiom,"
`Text.isInfixOf`
preparedTypedTptpText
preparedFof)
assertBool "FOF has no TH0 declarations"
(not
("thf("
`Text.isInfixOf`
preparedTypedTptpText
preparedFof))
assertEqual "TH0 route" RouteTh0
(preparedTypedTptpRoute preparedTh0)
assertEqual "TH0 request dialect"
VerificationTh0
(preparedVerificationDialect
(preparedTypedProverRequest
proverTask))
assertEqual "request preserves exact prepared text"
(preparedTypedTptpText preparedTh0)
(preparedVerificationText
(preparedTypedProverRequest
proverTask))
for_
[ "thf(zf_h0,axiom,"
, "^ [V0:$i]"
, "thf(zf_q0,conjecture,"
]
\fragment ->
assertBool
("TH0 contains " <> Text.unpack fragment)
(fragment
`Text.isInfixOf`
preparedTypedTptpText
preparedTh0)
for_
(Map.keys
(preparedTypedTptpNameOrigins
preparedTh0))
\target ->
assertBool
("valid generated name " <> Text.unpack target)
(if "V" `Text.isPrefixOf` target
then Tptp.isProperVariable target
else Tptp.isProperAtomicWord target)
where
planned selectedFacts claim selection =
either
(assertFailure . show)
pure
(planTypedProblem
testGlobalType
selectedFacts
claim
[]
[]
selection)
firstOrderClaim :: CanonicalTerm TestGlobal
firstOrderClaim =
CApp
(CGlobal FirstOrderPredicate)
(CIntrinsic Empty)
higherOrderClaim :: CanonicalTerm TestGlobal
higherOrderClaim =
CApp
(CGlobal HigherOrderPredicate)
(CLam TySet
(CApp
(CGlobal FirstOrderPredicate)
(CBound 0)))
checkedProposition
:: Vector (TestLocal, CoreType)
-> CanonicalTerm TestGlobal
-> IO
(SupportedProposition
TestLocal
TestGlobal)
checkedProposition support term = do
checked <-
either
(assertFailure . show)
pure
(checkScopedCanonicalCore
testGlobalType
(snd <$> Vector.toList support)
term)
either
(assertFailure . show)
pure
(supportedProposition support checked)
checkedClosedProposition
:: CanonicalTerm TestGlobal
-> IO
(SupportedProposition
Void
TestGlobal)
checkedClosedProposition term = do
checked <-
either
(assertFailure . show)
pure
(checkScopedCanonicalCore
testGlobalType
[]
term)
either
(assertFailure . show)
pure
(supportedProposition
Vector.empty
checked)
checkedBackendFact
:: ref
-> CanonicalTerm TestGlobal
-> IO (TypedBackendFact ref TestGlobal)
checkedBackendFact reference term = do
proposition <-
checkedClosedProposition term
capability <-
either
(assertFailure . show)
pure
(classifySupportedProposition
testGlobalType
proposition)
pure
(typedBackendFact
reference
proposition
capability)
checkedLocalPremise
:: Natural
-> Text
-> SupportedProposition TestLocal TestGlobal
-> IO
(TypedLocalPremise
TestLocal
Text
TestGlobal)
checkedLocalPremise ordinal premiseOrigin proposition =
either
(assertFailure . show)
pure
(typedLocalPremise
testGlobalType
(localPremiseOrdinal ordinal)
premiseOrigin
proposition)
|