summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/source/Test/Unit/Backend.hs
blob: 81a911aaf71a1d2d31704dbe04495c40a0ba2dae (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
{-# LANGUAGE NoImplicitPrelude #-}
{-# LANGUAGE OverloadedStrings #-}

module Test.Unit.Backend (unitTests) where

import Base hiding (Empty)
import Checking.Backend.Problem
import Checking.Backend.Tptp
import Checking.Core
import Checking.Foundation qualified as Foundation
import Provers
import Tptp.UnsortedFirstOrder qualified as Tptp

import Data.Map.Strict qualified as Map
import Data.Text qualified as Text
import Data.Vector (Vector)
import Data.Vector qualified as Vector
import Numeric.Natural (Natural)
import Test.Tasty
import Test.Tasty.HUnit


data TestGlobal
    = FirstOrderPredicate
    | HigherOrderPredicate
    deriving (Show, Eq, Ord)

testGlobalType :: TestGlobal -> Maybe CoreType
testGlobalType = \case
    FirstOrderPredicate ->
        Just (TySet `TyArrow` TyProp)
    HigherOrderPredicate ->
        Just
            ((TySet `TyArrow` TyProp)
                `TyArrow` TyProp)

data TestLocal
    = ObjectLocal
    | PredicateLocal
    deriving (Show, Eq, Ord)

unitTests :: TestTree
unitTests =
    testGroup "Typed backend problem"
        [ testCase
            "projects proposition equality as equivalence"
            classifiesPropositionEquality
        , testCase
            "projects exact ambient support"
            projectsExactAmbientSupport
        , testCase
            "routes implicit, explicit, and local-only problems"
            routesCompleteProblems
        , testCase
            "admits only checked implicit set constructions"
            admitsImplicitSetConstructions
        , testCase
            "renders checked FOF and TH0 problems"
            rendersCheckedProblems
        ]

classifiesPropositionEquality :: Assertion
classifiesPropositionEquality = do
    proposition <-
        checkedProposition
            Vector.empty
            (CEq TyProp CFalsum CFalsum)
    capability <-
        either
            (assertFailure . show)
            pure
            (classifySupportedProposition
                testGlobalType
                proposition)
    case capability of
        FofProjectable{} ->
            pure ()
        RequiresTh0 exclusions ->
            assertFailure
                ("proposition equality was not projected: "
                    <> show exclusions)

projectsExactAmbientSupport :: Assertion
projectsExactAmbientSupport = do
    let term :: CanonicalTerm Void
        term =
            CForall TySet
                (CEq TySet
                    (CBound 1)
                    (CBound 3))
    scoped <-
        either
            (assertFailure . show)
            pure
            (checkScopedCanonicalCore
                (const Nothing)
                [TySet, TySet, TySet]
                term)
    projected <-
        either
            (assertFailure . show)
            pure
            (projectSupportedProposition
                (const Nothing)
                (Vector.fromList
                    [ (0 :: Int, TySet)
                    , (1, TySet)
                    , (2, TySet)
                    ])
                scoped)
    assertEqual
        "unused middle support is removed"
        (Vector.fromList
            [ (0 :: Int, TySet)
            , (2, TySet)
            ])
        (supportedPropositionSupport projected)
    assertEqual
        "indices are remapped below nested binders"
        (CForall TySet
            (CEq TySet
                (CBound 1)
                (CBound 2)))
        (supportedPropositionTerm projected)

routesCompleteProblems :: Assertion
routesCompleteProblems = do
    fofFact <-
        checkedBackendFact
            (0 :: Int)
            firstOrderClaim
    th0Fact <-
        checkedBackendFact
            (1 :: Int)
            higherOrderClaim
    let fofFacts =
            Vector.singleton fofFact
        th0Facts =
            Vector.singleton th0Fact
    claim <-
        checkedProposition
            (Vector.singleton
                (ObjectLocal, TySet))
            (CApp
                (CGlobal FirstOrderPredicate)
                (CBound 0))
    firstOrderLocal <-
        checkedLocalPremise
            0
            "first-order local"
            claim
    higherOrderLocalProposition <-
        checkedProposition
            (Vector.singleton
                (PredicateLocal,
                    TySet `TyArrow` TyProp))
            (CApp
                (CGlobal HigherOrderPredicate)
                (CBound 0))
    higherOrderLocal <-
        checkedLocalPremise
            1
            "higher-order local"
            higherOrderLocalProposition

    implicit <-
        planned
            fofFacts
            claim
            [higherOrderLocal, firstOrderLocal]
            []
            ImplicitPremiseSelection
    assertEqual "implicit route" RouteFof
        (typedProblemRoute implicit)
    assertEqual "implicit FOF globals" [0]
        (typedBackendFactReference
            <$> toList
                (typedProblemGlobalPremises
                    implicit))
    assertEqual "first-order local only" [0]
        (localPremiseOrdinalValue
            . typedLocalPremiseOrdinal
            <$> toList
                (typedProblemLocalPremises
                    implicit))

    explicitFof <-
        planned
            fofFacts
            claim
            [firstOrderLocal]
            []
            ExplicitGlobalPremiseSelection
    assertEqual "explicit FOF route" RouteFof
        (typedProblemRoute explicitFof)

    explicitTh0 <-
        planned
            th0Facts
            claim
            [firstOrderLocal]
            []
            ExplicitGlobalPremiseSelection
    assertEqual "explicit TH0 route" RouteTh0
        (typedProblemRoute explicitTh0)

    localOnly <-
        planned
            Vector.empty
            claim
            [higherOrderLocal, firstOrderLocal]
            []
            LocalOnlyPremiseSelection
    assertEqual "local-only TH0 route" RouteTh0
        (typedProblemRoute localOnly)
    assertEqual "local order restored" [0, 1]
        (localPremiseOrdinalValue
            . typedLocalPremiseOrdinal
            <$> toList
                (typedProblemLocalPremises
                    localOnly))
    assertEqual
        "complete ambient local inventory"
        (Map.fromList
            [ (ObjectLocal, TySet)
            , (PredicateLocal,
                TySet `TyArrow` TyProp)
            ])
        (typedProblemLocalTypes localOnly)

    case planTypedProblem
            testGlobalType
            Vector.empty
            claim
            [firstOrderLocal, firstOrderLocal]
            []
            LocalOnlyPremiseSelection of
        Left
            (TypedProblemDuplicateLocalPremiseOrdinal
                duplicateOrdinal) ->
                    assertEqual
                        "duplicate local ordinal"
                        0
                        (localPremiseOrdinalValue
                            duplicateOrdinal)
        result ->
            assertFailure
                ("expected duplicate local ordinal error, got "
                    <> showProblemResult result)

    higherOrderClaimProposition <-
        checkedProposition
            Vector.empty
            higherOrderClaim
    case planTypedProblem
            testGlobalType
            fofFacts
            higherOrderClaimProposition
            []
            []
            ImplicitPremiseSelection of
        Left
            TypedProblemExplicitHigherOrderJustificationRequired{} ->
                pure ()
        result ->
            assertFailure
                ("expected explicit higher-order error, got "
                    <> showProblemResult result)
    checkedFoundationValue <-
        either
            (assertFailure . show)
            pure
            Foundation.checkedFoundation
    case planTypedProblem
            testGlobalType
            fofFacts
            claim
            []
            [typedFoundationAuxiliaryInput
                checkedFoundationValue
                Foundation.SeparationCharacteristic]
            ImplicitPremiseSelection of
        Left
            TypedProblemExplicitHigherOrderJustificationRequired{} ->
                pure ()
        result ->
            assertFailure
                ("expected implicit higher-order auxiliary error, got "
                    <> showProblemResult result)
    unusedContext <-
        either
            (assertFailure . show)
            pure
            (checkScopedCanonicalCore
                testGlobalType
                [TySet `TyArrow` TyProp]
                firstOrderClaim)
    case supportedProposition
            (Vector.singleton
                (PredicateLocal,
                    TySet `TyArrow` TyProp))
            unusedContext of
        Left (UnusedSupportedLocal PredicateLocal) ->
            pure ()
        Left err ->
            assertFailure
                ("unexpected exact-support error: "
                    <> show err)
        Right _ ->
            assertFailure
                "unused ambient local entered exact support"
  where
    planned selectedFacts claim locals auxiliaries selection =
        either
            (assertFailure . show)
            pure
            (planTypedProblem
                testGlobalType
                selectedFacts
                claim
                locals
                auxiliaries
                selection)

    showProblemResult = \case
        Left err ->
            show err
        Right problem ->
            show (typedProblemRoute problem)

admitsImplicitSetConstructions :: Assertion
admitsImplicitSetConstructions = do
    checkedFoundationValue <-
        either
            (assertFailure . show)
            pure
            Foundation.checkedFoundation
    let separation =
            CApp
                (CApp
                    (CIntrinsic Sep)
                    (CIntrinsic Empty))
                (CLam TySet
                    (CApp
                        (CGlobal HigherOrderPredicate)
                        (CLam TySet CFalsum)))
        separationClaim =
            CEq TySet separation separation
        filteredDomain =
            CApp
                (CApp
                    (CIntrinsic Sep)
                    (CBound 0))
                (CLam TySet
                    (CEq TySet (CBound 0) (CBound 0)))
        innerReplacement =
            CApp
                (CApp (CIntrinsic Repl) filteredDomain)
                (CLam TySet (CBound 0))
        functionalReplacement =
            CApp
                (CIntrinsic FamilyUnion)
                (CApp
                    (CApp
                        (CIntrinsic Repl)
                        (CIntrinsic Empty))
                    (CLam TySet innerReplacement))
        replacementClaim =
            CEq TySet functionalReplacement functionalReplacement
        replacementTags =
            [ Foundation.FamilyUnionCharacteristic
            , Foundation.SeparationCharacteristic
            , Foundation.ReplacementCharacteristic
            ]
        auxiliary tag =
            typedFoundationAuxiliaryInput
                checkedFoundationValue tag
        plan selected claim locals tags =
            planTypedProblem
                testGlobalType
                selected
                claim
                locals
                (auxiliary <$> tags)
                ImplicitPremiseSelection

    separationProposition <-
        checkedProposition Vector.empty separationClaim
    separationProblem <-
        either
            (assertFailure . show)
            pure
            (plan
                Vector.empty
                separationProposition
                []
                [Foundation.SeparationCharacteristic])
    assertEqual "separation implicit route" RouteTh0
        (typedProblemRoute separationProblem)
    assertEqual "separation characteristic only"
        [Foundation.SeparationCharacteristic]
        (typedProblemAuxiliaryTag
            <$> toList (typedProblemAuxiliaries separationProblem))
    assertEqual "separation selects no global premise"
        0
        (Vector.length (typedProblemGlobalPremises separationProblem))

    replacementProposition <-
        checkedProposition Vector.empty replacementClaim
    replacementProblem <-
        either
            (assertFailure . show)
            pure
            (plan
                Vector.empty
                replacementProposition
                []
                replacementTags)
    assertEqual "functional replacement implicit route" RouteTh0
        (typedProblemRoute replacementProblem)
    assertEqual "functional replacement exact helper set"
        replacementTags
        (typedProblemAuxiliaryTag
            <$> toList (typedProblemAuxiliaries replacementProblem))

    firstOrderProposition <-
        checkedProposition Vector.empty firstOrderClaim
    firstOrderLocal <-
        checkedLocalPremise 0 "first-order" firstOrderProposition
    separationLocal <-
        checkedLocalPremise 2 "separation" separationProposition
    unrelatedLocalProposition <-
        checkedProposition
            (Vector.singleton
                (PredicateLocal, TySet `TyArrow` TyProp))
            (CApp
                (CGlobal HigherOrderPredicate)
                (CBound 0))
    unrelatedLocal <-
        checkedLocalPremise 1 "unrelated higher-order" unrelatedLocalProposition
    localProblem <-
        either
            (assertFailure . show)
            pure
            (plan
                Vector.empty
                firstOrderProposition
                [unrelatedLocal, separationLocal, firstOrderLocal]
                [Foundation.SeparationCharacteristic])
    assertEqual "construction local promotes the complete problem" RouteTh0
        (typedProblemRoute localProblem)
    assertEqual "unrelated higher-order local remains unselected"
        [0, 2]
        ( localPremiseOrdinalValue
            . typedLocalPremiseOrdinal
            <$> toList (typedProblemLocalPremises localProblem)
        )

    higherOrderFact <- checkedBackendFact (1 :: Int) higherOrderClaim
    expectImplicitHigherOrderRejection
        "implicit higher-order global remains forbidden"
        (plan
            (Vector.singleton higherOrderFact)
            separationProposition
            []
            [Foundation.SeparationCharacteristic])

    ordinaryHigherOrder <-
        checkedProposition Vector.empty
            (CEq TySet
                (CApp
                    (CIntrinsic SetChoose)
                    (CLam TySet CFalsum))
                (CIntrinsic Empty))
    expectImplicitHigherOrderRejection
        "ordinary implicit higher-order target remains forbidden"
        (plan Vector.empty ordinaryHigherOrder [] [])
    mixedHigherOrder <-
        checkedProposition Vector.empty
            (CImp
                separationClaim
                (supportedPropositionTerm ordinaryHigherOrder))
    expectImplicitHigherOrderRejection
        "construction does not admit another higher-order intrinsic"
        (plan
            Vector.empty
            mixedHigherOrder
            []
            [Foundation.SeparationCharacteristic])

    expectImplicitHigherOrderRejection
        "auxiliary tag alone grants no construction permission"
        (plan
            Vector.empty
            firstOrderProposition
            []
            [Foundation.SeparationCharacteristic])
  where
    expectImplicitHigherOrderRejection label = \case
        Left TypedProblemExplicitHigherOrderJustificationRequired{} ->
            pure ()
        Left err ->
            assertFailure (label <> ": unexpected error " <> show err)
        Right problem ->
            assertFailure
                (label <> ": unexpectedly routed "
                    <> show (typedProblemRoute problem))

rendersCheckedProblems :: Assertion
rendersCheckedProblems = do
    fofFact <-
        checkedBackendFact
            (0 :: Int)
            firstOrderClaim
    th0Fact <-
        checkedBackendFact
            (1 :: Int)
            higherOrderClaim
    claim <-
        checkedProposition
            (Vector.singleton
                (ObjectLocal, TySet))
            (CApp
                (CGlobal FirstOrderPredicate)
                (CBound 0))
    fofProblem <-
        planned
            (Vector.singleton fofFact)
            claim
            ImplicitPremiseSelection
    th0Problem <-
        planned
            (Vector.singleton th0Fact)
            claim
            ExplicitGlobalPremiseSelection
    preparedFof <-
        either
            (assertFailure . show)
            pure
            (prepareTypedTptpProblem
                fofProblem)
    preparedTh0 <-
        either
            (assertFailure . show)
            pure
            (prepareTypedTptpProblem
                th0Problem)
    proverTask <-
        either
            (assertFailure . show)
            pure
            (prepareTypedProverTask
                DirectTask
                th0Problem)
    assertEqual "FOF route" RouteFof
        (preparedTypedTptpRoute preparedFof)
    assertBool "FOF formulas"
        ("fof(zf_h0,axiom,"
            `Text.isInfixOf`
                preparedTypedTptpText
                    preparedFof)
    assertBool "FOF has no TH0 declarations"
        (not
            ("thf("
                `Text.isInfixOf`
                    preparedTypedTptpText
                        preparedFof))
    assertEqual "TH0 route" RouteTh0
        (preparedTypedTptpRoute preparedTh0)
    assertEqual "TH0 request dialect"
        VerificationTh0
        (preparedVerificationDialect
            (preparedTypedProverRequest
                proverTask))
    assertEqual "request preserves exact prepared text"
        (preparedTypedTptpText preparedTh0)
        (preparedVerificationText
            (preparedTypedProverRequest
                proverTask))
    for_
        [ "thf(zf_h0,axiom,"
        , "^ [V0:$i]"
        , "thf(zf_q0,conjecture,"
        ]
        \fragment ->
            assertBool
                ("TH0 contains " <> Text.unpack fragment)
                (fragment
                    `Text.isInfixOf`
                        preparedTypedTptpText
                            preparedTh0)
    for_
        (Map.keys
            (preparedTypedTptpNameOrigins
                preparedTh0))
        \target ->
            assertBool
                ("valid generated name " <> Text.unpack target)
                (if "V" `Text.isPrefixOf` target
                    then Tptp.isProperVariable target
                    else Tptp.isProperAtomicWord target)
  where
    planned selectedFacts claim selection =
        either
            (assertFailure . show)
            pure
            (planTypedProblem
                testGlobalType
                selectedFacts
                claim
                []
                []
                selection)

firstOrderClaim :: CanonicalTerm TestGlobal
firstOrderClaim =
    CApp
        (CGlobal FirstOrderPredicate)
        (CIntrinsic Empty)

higherOrderClaim :: CanonicalTerm TestGlobal
higherOrderClaim =
    CApp
        (CGlobal HigherOrderPredicate)
        (CLam TySet
            (CApp
                (CGlobal FirstOrderPredicate)
                (CBound 0)))

checkedProposition
    :: Vector (TestLocal, CoreType)
    -> CanonicalTerm TestGlobal
    -> IO
        (SupportedProposition
            TestLocal
            TestGlobal)
checkedProposition support term = do
    checked <-
        either
            (assertFailure . show)
            pure
            (checkScopedCanonicalCore
                testGlobalType
                (snd <$> Vector.toList support)
                term)
    either
        (assertFailure . show)
        pure
        (supportedProposition support checked)

checkedClosedProposition
    :: CanonicalTerm TestGlobal
    -> IO
        (SupportedProposition
            Void
            TestGlobal)
checkedClosedProposition term = do
    checked <-
        either
            (assertFailure . show)
            pure
            (checkScopedCanonicalCore
                testGlobalType
                []
                term)
    either
        (assertFailure . show)
        pure
        (supportedProposition
            Vector.empty
            checked)

checkedBackendFact
    :: ref
    -> CanonicalTerm TestGlobal
    -> IO (TypedBackendFact ref TestGlobal)
checkedBackendFact reference term = do
    proposition <-
        checkedClosedProposition term
    capability <-
        either
            (assertFailure . show)
            pure
            (classifySupportedProposition
                testGlobalType
                proposition)
    pure
        (typedBackendFact
            reference
            proposition
            capability)

checkedLocalPremise
    :: Natural
    -> Text
    -> SupportedProposition TestLocal TestGlobal
    -> IO
        (TypedLocalPremise
            TestLocal
            Text
            TestGlobal)
checkedLocalPremise ordinal premiseOrigin proposition =
    either
        (assertFailure . show)
        pure
        (typedLocalPremise
            testGlobalType
            (localPremiseOrdinal ordinal)
            premiseOrigin
            proposition)