summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/examples
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authoraarne <unknown>2004-09-20 09:04:13 +0000
committeraarne <unknown>2004-09-20 09:04:13 +0000
commitc8c9e517c12c88708fb4f3f8dbe0c1995d38e111 (patch)
tree998e99f3c4a3a917d3f681404e11c20db58db8b9 /examples
parenta3ae63e60bbcf5122c7d3762989815a4de6962c2 (diff)
editor
Diffstat (limited to 'examples')
-rw-r--r--examples/gfcc/complin.tex9
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/examples/gfcc/complin.tex b/examples/gfcc/complin.tex
index 68086e989..dc9495a47 100644
--- a/examples/gfcc/complin.tex
+++ b/examples/gfcc/complin.tex
@@ -708,10 +708,13 @@ already possible, even though more support could be
desired for things like literals and precedences.
The parser generated by GF is not able to parse all
-source programs, because of cyclic context-free
-rules (of the form $C ::= C$). Recovery from cyclic
+source programs, because some cyclic parse
+rules (of the form $C ::= C$) are generated. Recovery from cyclic
rules is ongoing work in GF independently of this
-experiment.
+experiment.
+For the time being, the interactive editor is the best way to
+construct C programs using our grammar.
+
The most serious problem is that the idea of compilation
as linearization does not quite work in the generation