moving a few things to deprecated

1 files changed, 0 insertions, 53 deletions

diff --git a/old-lib/resource/interlingua/RelativeIna.gf b/old-lib/resource/interlingua/RelativeIna.gf
deleted file mode 100644
index ebdebcd13..000000000
--- a/old-lib/resource/interlingua/RelativeIna.gf
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,53 +0,0 @@
-concrete RelativeIna of Relative = CatIna ** open ResIna in {
-
-  flags optimize=all_subs ;
-
-  lin
-
-    RelCl cl = {
-      s = \\t,a,p,agr => 
-	(case agr.n of {Sg => "tal"; Pl => "tales"}) ++ 
-	"que" ++ cl.s ! t ! a ! p ! ODir ; 
-      c = Nom
-      } ;
-
-    RelVP rp vp = {
-      s = \\t,a,p,agr => (mkClause (rp.s!Nom) agr vp).s ! t ! a ! p ! ODir;
-      c = Nom
-      } ; 
-    -- !!! person agreement is probably bad here; see below.
-
----- Pied piping: "a que tu invia flores"
-
-    RelSlash rp slash = {
-      s = \\t,a,p,agr => slash.p2 ++ rp.s ! slash.c2 ++ slash.s ! t ! a ! p ! ODir ;
-      c = slash.c2; 
-      } ; 
-    -- !!! In the above The agreement feature of the RP does not match
-    -- the the (parametric!) agreement of the resulting clause.  
-    -- Is it a bug? I believe there is the same behaviour in the english grammar.
-
-    FunRP p np rp = {
-      s = \\c => np.s ! Acc ++ p.s ++ rp.s ! p.c ;
-      a = np.a
-      } ;
-
-
-    IdRP = {
-	-- TODO: variant: "le qual"
-      a = {p = P3; n = variants {Sg; Pl}};
-      s = table {
-	Nom => quique;   --  Le ultime traino que pote portar me ibi a tempore parti in cinque minutas
-	Gen => "cuje";  --  Le documentos cuje importantia esseva dubitose incriminava le spia
-	Acc => "que";   --  Le documentos que le spia portava con se esseva multo importante 
-	Dat => "a" ++ quique;
-	Abl => "de" ++ quique
-      }} ;
-
-    oper 
-      quique = variants {"qui";  -- !!! Only for humans, only after a preposition.
-			 -- This is extremely strange, because it does not match any Romance language I know. 
-			 -- For now just be lax and make it a variant of "que"
-			 "que"};
-      
-}