diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | .gitignore | 4 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | library/topology/basis.tex | 1 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | vampire-taks-with-unexpacted-behavoir/50-plus-secounds-for-iff-stamtent.p | 6 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | vampire-taks-with-unexpacted-behavoir/topological-basis-behovoir.p | 26 |
4 files changed, 35 insertions, 2 deletions
@@ -41,6 +41,6 @@ premseldump/ haddocks/ stack.yaml.lock zf*.svg -Anmerkungen.txt -vampire-taks-with-not-expacted-behavoir/ + + diff --git a/library/topology/basis.tex b/library/topology/basis.tex index 4f66166..6fa9fbd 100644 --- a/library/topology/basis.tex +++ b/library/topology/basis.tex @@ -84,6 +84,7 @@ We have $(A \inter C) \in \pow{X}$ by \cref{genopens,inter_powerset}. + Show for all $x\in (A\inter C)$ there exists $W \in B$ such that $x\in W$ and $W \subseteq (A\inter C)$. \begin{subproof} diff --git a/vampire-taks-with-unexpacted-behavoir/50-plus-secounds-for-iff-stamtent.p b/vampire-taks-with-unexpacted-behavoir/50-plus-secounds-for-iff-stamtent.p new file mode 100644 index 0000000..19ed046 --- /dev/null +++ b/vampire-taks-with-unexpacted-behavoir/50-plus-secounds-for-iff-stamtent.p @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ +fof(inters_in_genopens,conjecture,unions(fB)=fX). +fof(topological_basis,axiom,![XB,XX]:(topological_basis(XB,XX)<=>(unions(XB)=XX&![XU,XV,Xx]:((elem(XU,XB)&elem(XV,XB)&elem(Xx,XU)&elem(Xx,XV))=>?[XW]:(elem(XW,XB)&elem(Xx,XW)&subseteq(XW,XU)&subseteq(XW,XV)))))). +fof(inters_in_genopens1,axiom,elem(fx,fVprimeprime)&subseteq(fVprimeprime,fC)&elem(fVprimeprime,fB)). +fof(inters_in_genopens2,axiom,elem(fx,fVprime)&subseteq(fVprime,fA)&elem(fVprime,fB)). +fof(inters_in_genopens3,axiom,elem(fx,inter(fA,fC))). +fof(inters_in_genopens4,axiom,topological_basis(fB,fX)). diff --git a/vampire-taks-with-unexpacted-behavoir/topological-basis-behovoir.p b/vampire-taks-with-unexpacted-behavoir/topological-basis-behovoir.p new file mode 100644 index 0000000..76b03e4 --- /dev/null +++ b/vampire-taks-with-unexpacted-behavoir/topological-basis-behovoir.p @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@ +% It doesn't make sense for me that this task takes so long. It taks on my computer nearly 50-60 secounds. + +fof(inters_in_genopens,conjecture,?[XW]:(elem(XW,fB)&elem(fx,XW)&subseteq(XW,fvprime)&subseteq(XW,fVprimeprime))). +%fof(topological_basis,axiom,![XB,XX]:(topological_basis(XB,XX)<=>(unions(XB)=XX&![XU,XV,Xx]:((elem(XU,XB)&elem(XV,XB)&elem(Xx,XU)&elem(Xx,XV))=>?[XW]:(elem(XW,XB)&elem(Xx,XW)&subseteq(XW,XU)&subseteq(XW,XV)))))). +fof(inters_in_genopens1,axiom,elem(fx,fVprimeprime)&subseteq(fVprimeprime,fC)&elem(fVprimeprime,fB)). +fof(inters_in_genopens2,axiom,elem(fx,fVprime)&subseteq(fVprime,fA)&elem(fVprime,fB)). +fof(inters_in_genopens3,axiom,elem(fx,inter(fA,fC))). +fof(inters_in_genopens4,axiom,topological_basis(fB,fX)). + +fof(topological_basis1,axiom,![XU,XV,Xx]:((elem(XU,fB)&elem(XV,fB)&elem(Xx,XU)&elem(Xx,XV))=>?[XW]:(elem(XW,fB)&elem(Xx,XW)&subseteq(XW,XU)&subseteq(XW,XV)))). + +fof(inters_in_genopens10,axiom,subseteq(fVprime,fA)). +fof(inters_in_genopens11,axiom,subseteq(fVprimeprime,fC)). +fof(inters_in_genopens12,axiom,elem(fx,fVprime)). +fof(inters_in_genopens13,axiom,elem(fx,fVprimeprime)). + + +% the task (unions(fB)=fX) takes only 0.2 secounds +% but if it is stated as an axiom it doesn't effect any proof time. + + +% with this axiom it takes 27 secounds so it improve the overall time, +% but this axiom is just a "and" more and combines axiom 1 and 2 +% fof(inters_in_genopens5,axiom,elem(fVprimeprime,fB)&elem(fVprimeprime,fB)&elem(fx,fVprime)&elem(fx,fVprimeprime)). + +% fof(topological_basis1,axiom,![XU,XV,Xx]:((elem(XU,fB)&elem(XV,fB)&elem(Xx,XU)&elem(Xx,XV))=>?[XW]:(elem(XW,fB)&elem(Xx,XW)&subseteq(XW,XU)&subseteq(XW,XV)))).
\ No newline at end of file |